From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: sched: cls_u32 Various improvements Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 07:11:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20181008061112.GD32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20181007163811.18453-1-jhs@emojatatu.com> <20181007.212501.1606549212155525845.davem@davemloft.net> <20181008054515.GC32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20181007.225552.488756286647781616.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:43948 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725842AbeJHNVT (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 09:21:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181007.225552.488756286647781616.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:55:52PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Al Viro > Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 06:45:15 +0100 > > > Er... Both are due to missing in the very beginning of the series (well, on > > top of "net: sched: cls_u32: fix hnode refcounting") commit > > All dependencies like this must be explicitly stated. > > And in such situations you actually should wait for the dependency to > get into 'net', eventually get merged into 'net-next', and then you > can submit the stuff that depends upon it. > > Not the way this was done. Point (and this commit is simply missing - it's not that it went into net). FWIW, this was simply "this is what the breakage is caused by", not an attempt to amend the submission or anything like that...