From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 4.9 00/29] backport of IP fragmentation fixes
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:18:10 -0700
Message-ID: <20181010160949.3cdc4fbc@xeon-e3>
References: <20181009224924.30151-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
        <28926712-da72-7188-e219-152dddec9330@gmail.com>
        <eae8e2b7-acc6-22d6-6354-0b7d50af3800@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <eae8e2b7-acc6-22d6-6354-0b7d50af3800@gmail.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:15:04 -0700
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:

> > 
> > Strange, I do not see "ip: use rb trees for IP frag queue." in this list ?  
> 
> And it was not in Stephen's backport to 4.14 either, wait, looks like it
> was somehow squashed into "net: sk_buff rbnode reorg". Stephen, was
> there a reason for that?
> 
> Let me go back and add bffa72cf7f9df842f0016ba03586039296b4caaf as well
> as eeea10b83a139451130df1594f26710c8fa390c8 to the rebase todo and see
> how things go from there.
> 
> Thanks for taking a look.

I don't remember, spent time doing cherry-pick and fixups. Maybe the reorg
commit got squashed as part of one rebase.