Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, tyhicks@canonical.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, amritha.nambiar@intel.com,
	joe@perches.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, decot@googlers.com,
	roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
	nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, minkim@us.ibm.com,
	tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sysfs: Remove devices without receive buffers
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 16:50:56 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181013.165056.111476046287532695.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181013220451.6905.65084.stgit@ltcalpine2-lp9.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>

From: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 17:05:28 -0500

> Testing ran into a case where a network device was created and
> initialized, but then removed from the system before accepting
> traffic through it.  In this case, no receive buffers were added
> to the device prior to attempting to release the driver.  This
> resulted in generation of a WARNING notice/stack trace in the
> console log like,

That's not legal.

The device must setup all of this kind of state before calling
register_netdevice().  And this must happen for reasons other than the
crash situation mentioned here.

Please fix the ibmvnic driver to not register partially setup netdev
objects.

Thank you.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-14  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-13 22:05 [PATCH] net/sysfs: Remove devices without receive buffers Michael Bringmann
2018-10-13 23:50 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181013.165056.111476046287532695.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
    --cc=decot@googlers.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minkim@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
    --cc=tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox