From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] isdn: hfc_{pci,sx}: Avoid empty body if statements Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20181018.175058.827953425036498775.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20181019002117.GA10161@flashbox> <20181018.172310.35380794084221855.davem@davemloft.net> <20181019004251.GA28878@flashbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: isdn@linux-pingi.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com To: natechancellor@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:43836 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725945AbeJSIyi (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 04:54:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20181019004251.GA28878@flashbox> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Nathan Chancellor Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:42:51 -0700 > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 05:23:10PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Nathan Chancellor >> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:21:17 -0700 >> >> > Thanks for the review, I went ahead and compiled with the following diff >> > on top of v2 and got no warnings from Clang, GCC, or sparse, does this >> > seem satisfactory for v3? >> >> Well, one thing I notice. >> > >> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ release_io_hfcpci(struct IsdnCardState *cs) >> > pci_free_consistent(cs->hw.hfcpci.dev, 0x8000, >> > cs->hw.hfcpci.fifos, cs->hw.hfcpci.dma); >> > cs->hw.hfcpci.fifos = NULL; >> > - iounmap((void *)cs->hw.hfcpci.pci_io); >> > + iounmap(cs->hw.hfcpci.pci_io); >> > } >> >> Driver uses iounmap(). >> >> > @@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ setup_hfcpci(struct IsdnCard *card) >> > printk(KERN_WARNING "HFC-PCI: No IRQ for PCI card found\n"); >> > return (0); >> > } >> > - cs->hw.hfcpci.pci_io = (char *)(unsigned long)dev_hfcpci->resource[1].start; >> > + cs->hw.hfcpci.pci_io = (void __iomem *)(unsigned long)dev_hfcpci->resource[1].start; >> > printk(KERN_INFO "HiSax: HFC-PCI card manufacturer: %s card name: %s\n", id_list[i].vendor_name, id_list[i].card_name); >> >> But does not use iomap(). You won't need any cast here if it did use >> iomap() properly. >> >> Thanks. > > So this? That's definitely a lot better, yes! I wonder what exactly it is checking there though. I guess it wants to see if the resource->start value is zero and bail with an error it so. Anyways, this code has been like this for ages and what you are proposing is definitely a significant improvement. Thanks.