From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix wrong helper enablement in cgroup local storage
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:05:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181026230516.gx5blwpqcr2ixyta@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026225709.GA12467@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:57:18PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 12:49:02AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > Commit cd3394317653 ("bpf: introduce the bpf_get_local_storage()
> > helper function") enabled the bpf_get_local_storage() helper also
> > for BPF program types where it does not make sense to use them.
> >
> > They have been added both in sk_skb_func_proto() and sk_msg_func_proto()
> > even though both program types are not invoked in combination with
> > cgroups, and neither through BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(). In the latter the
> > bpf_cgroup_storage_set() is set shortly before BPF program invocation.
> >
> > Later, the helper bpf_get_local_storage() retrieves this prior set
> > up per-cpu pointer and hands the buffer to the BPF program. The map
> > argument in there solely retrieves the enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type
> > from a local storage map associated with the program and based on the
> > type returns either the global or per-cpu storage. However, there
> > is no specific association between the program's map and the actual
> > content in bpf_cgroup_storage[].
> >
> > Meaning, any BPF program that would have been properly run from the
> > cgroup side through BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY() where bpf_cgroup_storage_set()
> > was performed, and that is later unloaded such that prog / maps are
> > teared down will cause a use after free if that pointer is retrieved
> > from programs that are not run through BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY() but have
> > the cgroup local storage helper enabled in their func proto.
> >
> > Lets just remove it from the two sock_map program types to fix it.
> > Auditing through the types where this helper is enabled, it appears
> > that these are the only ones where it was mistakenly allowed.
> >
> > Fixes: cd3394317653 ("bpf: introduce the bpf_get_local_storage() helper function")
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> > Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> > Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
>
>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Applied, Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-27 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 22:49 [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix wrong helper enablement in cgroup local storage Daniel Borkmann
2018-10-26 22:57 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-10-26 23:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181026230516.gx5blwpqcr2ixyta@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox