From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:16:32 -0700
Message-ID: <20181031211632.f7imvzvrsn6pbwgb@localhost>
References: <20181026162742.631-1-mlichvar@redhat.com>
 <20181026162742.631-5-mlichvar@redhat.com>
 <02874ECE860811409154E81DA85FBB5884CE4B8C@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <20181029133109.GD31668@localhost>
 <20181031144003.qs235wjmiuwaprps@localhost>
 <20181031144935.GR31668@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:45537 "EHLO
        mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726346AbeKAGQW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 02:16:22 -0400
Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id v5-v6so3313910pfm.12
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181031144935.GR31668@localhost>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 03:49:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> 
> How about separating the PHC timestamp from the ptp_system_timestamp
> structure and use NULL to indicate we don't want to read the system
> clock? A gettimex64(ptp, ts, NULL) call would be equal to
> gettime64(ptp, ts).

Doesn't sound too bad to me.

Thanks,
Richard