Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iucv: Remove SKB list assumptions.
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:55:45 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181110.165545.1492330402009389392.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)


Eliminate the assumption that SKBs and SKB list heads can
be cast to eachother in SKB list handling code.

This change also appears to fix a bug since the list->next pointer is
sampled outside of holding the SKB queue lock.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 41 +++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
index 0bed4cc20603..78ea5a739d10 100644
--- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
+++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
@@ -1873,30 +1873,26 @@ static void iucv_callback_txdone(struct iucv_path *path,
 	struct sock *sk = path->private;
 	struct sk_buff *this = NULL;
 	struct sk_buff_head *list = &iucv_sk(sk)->send_skb_q;
-	struct sk_buff *list_skb = list->next;
+	struct sk_buff *list_skb;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	bh_lock_sock(sk);
-	if (!skb_queue_empty(list)) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&list->lock, flags);
 
-		while (list_skb != (struct sk_buff *)list) {
-			if (msg->tag == IUCV_SKB_CB(list_skb)->tag) {
-				this = list_skb;
-				break;
-			}
-			list_skb = list_skb->next;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&list->lock, flags);
+	skb_queue_walk(list, list_skb) {
+		if (msg->tag == IUCV_SKB_CB(list_skb)->tag) {
+			this = list_skb;
+			break;
 		}
-		if (this)
-			__skb_unlink(this, list);
-
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list->lock, flags);
+	}
+	if (this)
+		__skb_unlink(this, list);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list->lock, flags);
 
-		if (this) {
-			kfree_skb(this);
-			/* wake up any process waiting for sending */
-			iucv_sock_wake_msglim(sk);
-		}
+	if (this) {
+		kfree_skb(this);
+		/* wake up any process waiting for sending */
+		iucv_sock_wake_msglim(sk);
 	}
 
 	if (sk->sk_state == IUCV_CLOSING) {
@@ -2284,11 +2280,7 @@ static void afiucv_hs_callback_txnotify(struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	list = &iucv->send_skb_q;
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&list->lock, flags);
-	if (skb_queue_empty(list))
-		goto out_unlock;
-	list_skb = list->next;
-	nskb = list_skb->next;
-	while (list_skb != (struct sk_buff *)list) {
+	skb_queue_walk_safe(list, list_skb, nskb) {
 		if (skb_shinfo(list_skb) == skb_shinfo(skb)) {
 			switch (n) {
 			case TX_NOTIFY_OK:
@@ -2321,10 +2313,7 @@ static void afiucv_hs_callback_txnotify(struct sk_buff *skb,
 			}
 			break;
 		}
-		list_skb = nskb;
-		nskb = nskb->next;
 	}
-out_unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list->lock, flags);
 
 	if (sk->sk_state == IUCV_CLOSING) {
-- 
2.19.1

             reply	other threads:[~2018-11-11 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-11  0:55 David Miller [this message]
2018-11-11  8:48 ` [PATCH] iucv: Remove SKB list assumptions Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181110.165545.1492330402009389392.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox