From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Kaehlcke Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix locking in bt_accept_enqueue() for BH context Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:40:03 -0800 Message-ID: <20181112214003.GE22824@google.com> References: <20181015223910.197729-1-mka@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konstantin Khlebnikov , Balakrishna Godavarthi , Douglas Anderson , Dmitry Grinberg To: Marcel Holtmann , Johan Hedberg , "David S . Miller" , Dean Jenkins Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181015223910.197729-1-mka@chromium.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:39:10PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > With commit e16337622016 ("Bluetooth: Handle bt_accept_enqueue() socket > atomically") lock_sock[_nested]() is used to acquire the socket lock > before manipulating the socket. lock_sock[_nested]() may block, which > is problematic since bt_accept_enqueue() can be called in bottom half > context (e.g. from rfcomm_connect_ind()). > > The socket API provides bh_lock_sock[_nested]() to acquire the socket > lock in bottom half context. Check the context in bt_accept_enqueue() > and use the appropriate locking mechanism for the context. > > Fixes: e16337622016 ("Bluetooth: Handle bt_accept_enqueue() socket atomically") > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke > --- > Not sure if this is the correct solution, it's certainly not elegant and > checkpatch.pl complains that in_atomic() shouldn't be used outside of > core kernel code. I'm open to other suggestions :) > > net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c > index deacc52d7ff1..0f0540dbb44a 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c > @@ -159,10 +159,20 @@ void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk) > BT_DBG("parent %p, sk %p", parent, sk); > > sock_hold(sk); > - lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > + > + if (in_atomic()) > + bh_lock_sock_nested(sk); > + else > + lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > + > list_add_tail(&bt_sk(sk)->accept_q, &bt_sk(parent)->accept_q); > bt_sk(sk)->parent = parent; > - release_sock(sk); > + > + if (in_atomic()) > + bh_unlock_sock(sk); > + else > + release_sock(sk); > + > parent->sk_ack_backlog++; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_accept_enqueue); Any comments or ideas for a better solutions? Thanks Matthias