From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: Add trace events for all receive exit points Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 19:50:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20181116.195036.1120979831963497428.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20181113201326.5627-1-gbastien@versatic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com To: gbastien@versatic.net Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:48222 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729714AbeKQOFv (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2018 09:05:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20181113201326.5627-1-gbastien@versatic.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Geneviève Bastien Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:13:26 -0500 > @@ -5222,9 +5228,14 @@ static void netif_receive_skb_list_internal(struct list_head *head) > */ > int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) > { > + int ret; > + > trace_netif_receive_skb_entry(skb); > > - return netif_receive_skb_internal(skb); > + ret = netif_receive_skb_internal(skb); > + trace_netif_receive_skb_exit(skb, ret); Every time I read this code from now on I'm going to say to myself "oh crap, we reference 'skb' after it's potentially freed up" I really don't like this. I know only the pointer is used, but that pointer can be reallocated to another SLAB object, even another SKB, by the time these exit tracepoints execute. Sorry, I can't really convince myself to apply this now.