From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next PATCH v3 2/2] man: tc-flower: Add explanation for
 range option
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:50:24 +0100
Message-ID: <20181121085024.GD2264@nanopsycho>
References: <154232971379.10668.16416943966699679792.stgit@anamhost.jf.intel.com>
 <154232971889.10668.16009642596079446767.stgit@anamhost.jf.intel.com>
 <1c2cee31-af86-e285-c9d9-09a3105daa4b@gmail.com>
 <3000d314-2217-b2e6-230c-c9b41f173f2f@intel.com>
 <2192286d-01ff-dea2-1699-defe72f64a95@gmail.com>
 <f4dd15da-3787-1351-9dcc-e7dbf06fb4b0@intel.com>
 <8426219f-7024-1030-01ce-8daecbaa097b@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>,
        stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
        jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:43301 "EHLO
        mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727006AbeKUTan (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:30:43 -0500
Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id r10so4742908wrs.10
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8426219f-7024-1030-01ce-8daecbaa097b@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 05:59:45AM CET, dsahern@gmail.com wrote:
>On 11/20/18 9:59 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> Oops, submitted the v2 patch for man changes too soon, without seeing
>> this. So, in this case, should I re-submit the iproute2-flower patch
>> that was accepted removing the 'range' keyword?
>
>I think so. Consistency across commands is a good thing.

+1