Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: bridge: add no_linklocal_learn bool option

[Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>]

>  int br_boolopt_get(const struct net_bridge *br, enum br_boolopt_id opt)
>  {
> -	int optval = 0;
> -
>  	switch (opt) {
> +	case BR_BOOLOPT_NO_LL_LEARN:
> +		return br_opt_get(br, BROPT_NO_LL_LEARN);
>  	default:
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	return optval;
> +	return 0;
>  }

It seems like 1/2 of that change belongs in the previous patch.

> --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
> @@ -328,6 +328,27 @@ static ssize_t flush_store(struct device *d,
>  }
>  static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(flush);
>  
> +static ssize_t no_linklocal_learn_show(struct device *d,
> +				       struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				       char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct net_bridge *br = to_bridge(d);
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", br_boolopt_get(br, BR_BOOLOPT_NO_LL_LEARN));
> +}
> +
> +static int set_no_linklocal_learn(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
> +{
> +	return br_boolopt_toggle(br, BR_BOOLOPT_NO_LL_LEARN, !!val);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t no_linklocal_learn_store(struct device *d,
> +					struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> +	return store_bridge_parm(d, buf, len, set_no_linklocal_learn);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(no_linklocal_learn);

I thought we where trying to move away from sysfs? Do we need to add
new options here? It seems like forcing people to use iproute2 for
newer options is a good way to get people to convert to iproute2.

	Andrew