From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com
Cc: colin.king@canonical.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: check for a null p->dev before dereferencing it
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 18:04:02 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181124.180402.645583819668180736.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85963d6a-3411-9461-67aa-42e1fd02e663@cumulusnetworks.com>
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 14:21:07 +0200
> I was contacted recently about this privately and this was my reply:
> "Checking new_nbp() and del_nbp() it should not be possible to reach that code
> with p->dev or p->br as NULL. The cap check code has always been there, I just
> shuffled the rest of the function to obtain rtnl lock and kept it as close to
> the original as possible, thus the checks remained.
> In order to avoid future reports like this I'll send a cleanup once net-next
> opens up.
>
> My reasoning of why it shouldn't be possible:
> - On port add new_nbp() sets both p->dev and p->br before creating kobj/sysfs
>
> - On port del (trickier) del_nbp() calls kobject_del() before call_rcu() to destroy
> the port which in turn calls sysfs_remove_dir() which uses kernfs_remove() which
> deactivates (shouldn't be able to open new files) and calls kernfs_drain() to drain
> current open/mmaped files in the respective dir before continuing, thus making it
> impossible to open a bridge port sysfs file with p->dev and p->br equal to NULL.
> "
>
> So I think it's safe to remove those checks altogether. It'd be nice to get a second
> look over my reasoning as I might be missing something in sysfs/kernfs call path.
I did a once over your analysis and I agree, the checks should be safe to remove.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-25 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-24 12:15 [PATCH] net: bridge: check for a null p->dev before dereferencing it Colin King
2018-11-24 12:21 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2018-11-25 2:04 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181124.180402.645583819668180736.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).