From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Can decnet be deprecated? Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 10:31:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20181125.103152.814206115647404048.davem@davemloft.net> References: <2c63cb14-ddba-dda3-4ef6-79b31101f162@gmail.com> <20181124.172509.1739636063027441678.davem@davemloft.net> <877eh12y3x.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: dsahern@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: bjorn@mork.no Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:44658 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725838AbeKZFXd (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:23:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877eh12y3x.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Bjørn Mork Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 12:30:26 +0100 > David Miller writes: >> From: David Ahern >> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700 >> >>> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow >>> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time. >> >> Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the list >> "Don't, we're using that!" > > Not sure about that. What I can see is a claim that it has no bugs: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/837484/ > > The V1 received only support for removal: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/837261/ > > But no one claimed they were using decnet. Ok, if people want to try and deprecate it again we can try.