From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nvme-cli v3 15/13] nvme: Add TCP transport
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:47:23 -0700
Message-ID: <20181126154723.GP26707@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20181122015615.15763-1-sagi@grimberg.me>
 <20181122015615.15763-16-sagi@grimberg.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:21705 "EHLO mga04.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726434AbeK0Coz (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:44:55 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181122015615.15763-16-sagi@grimberg.me>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

The cli parts good to me. Is there any forseeable issue if I apply these
ahead of the kernel integration? I don't see any, but just want to
confirm since its all in one series.