From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Can decnet be deprecated? Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:34:51 -0800 Message-ID: <20181126163451.49087c84@xeon-e3> References: <2c63cb14-ddba-dda3-4ef6-79b31101f162@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , David Miller To: David Ahern Return-path: Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:41156 "EHLO mail-pl1-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727456AbeK0La5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:30:57 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id u6so14701293plm.8 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:34:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2c63cb14-ddba-dda3-4ef6-79b31101f162@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700 David Ahern wrote: > IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow > suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time. > > David I have no problem with dropping decnet support from iproute first. Presumably anyone still using it is going to be on old distro tools anyway.