From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: BPF uapi structures and 32-bit
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20181128.110200.1264664274998624358.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20181127.142510.717161104715347913.davem@davemloft.net>
        <6ce1df16-6bcd-fb0a-f7fb-8dee45916438@iogearbox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com
To: daniel@iogearbox.net
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:36484 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1725772AbeK2GEk (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:04:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <6ce1df16-6bcd-fb0a-f7fb-8dee45916438@iogearbox.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:34:55 +0100

> Yeah fully agree. Thinking diff below should address it, do you
> have a chance to give this a spin for sparc / 32 bit to check if
> test_verifier still explodes?

Great, let me play with this.

I did something simpler yesterday, just changing the data pointers to
"u64" and that made at least one test pass that didn't before :-)

I'll get back to you with results.