From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/25] net: ethernet: provide nvmem_get_mac_address()
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20181129.111650.1439505511260881528.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20181113140133.17385-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
        <20181113140133.17385-11-brgl@bgdev.pl>
        <CAMRc=MdLSVw11hzzqPLfSyz38uA46+LvobGk3vSNcTvtqnD5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, khilman@kernel.org,
        nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, grygorii.strashko@ti.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com,
        nsekhar@ti.com
To: brgl@bgdev.pl
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MdLSVw11hzzqPLfSyz38uA46+LvobGk3vSNcTvtqnD5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:45:51 +0100

> If there are no objections - can patches 10-13 go into the networking
> tree already so that they spend some time in next before the merge
> window?

Please submit them as a separate series, clearly targetted at the
net-next tree.