From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Qian Cai <cai@gmx.us>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
yisen.zhuang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-debug: Kconfig for PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:33:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203173322.GB8282@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53ab96d7-5dc9-e1a9-4cf2-bb8bf80a3acf@huawei.com>
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:56:11AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 01/12/2018 16:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:39:50PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> I was assuming the point was to also add something like
>>>
>>> default 131072 if HNS_ENET
>>>
>>> so that DMA debug doesn't require too much thought from the user. If they
>>> still have to notice the overflow message and empirically figure out a
>>> value that does work, rebuilding the kernel each time is far less
>>> convenient than simply adding "dma_debug_entries=..." to their kernel
>>> command line and rebooting, which they can do today. If they do already
>>> know up-front that the default will need overriding and what the
>>> appropriate value is, then the command line still seems seems just as
>>> convenient.
>>
>> I'm not so fond of random drivers changing the defaults. My idea
>> was rather to have the config option so that the defconfig files for
>> the Hisilicon SOCs with this hardware could select a larger number
>> without making a total mess of the kernel configuration.
>>
>> If we really have to we could do different defaults, but I'd still
>> much rather do this on a arch/platform basis than specific drivers.
>
> As I understand, some drivers could even use much more than this (131072),
> to such a point where I can't imagine that we would want to set an arch
> default to support them. For this HNS_ENET case, it is arm64 specific so it
> would be an arch defconfig.
But I'm not sure we could always do the right thing for everyone.
I think we might be better of trying to just dynamically allocate
entries when we run out of them instead of coming up with a perfect
number.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-30 17:54 [PATCH] dma-debug: Kconfig for PREALLOC_DMA_DEBUG_ENTRIES Qian Cai
2018-11-30 19:39 ` Robin Murphy
[not found] ` <b22d2ad6-2638-96d7-1df2-24701589202f-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-12-01 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20181201163657.GA19557-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2018-12-03 11:56 ` John Garry
2018-12-03 17:33 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181203173322.GB8282@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cai@gmx.us \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).