From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: documentation: build a directory structure for
 drivers
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 23:34:55 -0800
Message-ID: <20181204233455.41e78793@cakuba.netronome.com>
References: <20181204014328.14424-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
        <20181204.211327.172944025163036359.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, oss-drivers@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, dsahern@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
        stephen@networkplumber.org, henrik@austad.us,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pl1-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:36341 "EHLO
        mail-pl1-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726171AbeLEHfB (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 02:35:01 -0500
Received: by mail-pl1-f179.google.com with SMTP id g9so9654222plo.3
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 23:35:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20181204.211327.172944025163036359.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 21:13:27 -0800 (PST), David Miller wrote:
> From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Date: Mon,  3 Dec 2018 17:43:28 -0800
> 
> > Documentation/networking/ is full of cryptically named files with
> > driver documentation.  This makes finding interesting information
> > at a glance really hard.  Move all those files into a directory
> > called device_drivers (since not all drivers are for device) and
> > fix up references.
> > 
> > RFC v0.1 -> RFC v1:
> >  - also add .txt suffix to the files which are missing it (Quentin)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
> > ---
> > I'm posting as an RFC to see what the general feeling is about
> > such a patch.  I can split into per-driver changes later if that's
> > the best way forward.  
> 
> I'm fine with this patch as-is.
> 
> Do you mind if I just apply it to net-next?

Not at all.  

I feel slightly bad for not CCing all the maintainers but then again it
just a slight reorg, I don't see a strong reason anyone would
particularly care.  

Thanks!