From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
jiri@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/7] devlink: Add devlink_param for port register and unregister
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:47:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181205114751.GB2318@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1543989420-14859-2-git-send-email-vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com>
Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 06:56:54AM CET, vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com wrote:
>Add functions to register and unregister for the driver supported
>configuration parameters table per port.
>
>Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>Signed-off-by: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com>
>---
> include/net/devlink.h | 29 +++++++++++
> net/core/devlink.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>index 67f4293..9b4d80b 100644
>--- a/include/net/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct devlink_port_attrs {
>
> struct devlink_port {
> struct list_head list;
>+ struct list_head param_list;
> struct devlink *devlink;
> unsigned index;
> bool registered;
>@@ -419,6 +420,13 @@ enum devlink_param_generic_id {
> .validate = _validate, \
> }
>
>+enum devlink_port_param_generic_id {
>+ /* add new param generic ids above here */
>+ __DEVLINK_PORT_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MAX,
>+ DEVLINK_PORT_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MAX =
>+ __DEVLINK_PORT_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MAX - 1,
>+};
I don't see the need for enum just for per-port params. The existing
params enum should be enough.
>+
> struct devlink_region;
>
> typedef void devlink_snapshot_data_dest_t(const void *data);
>@@ -574,6 +582,12 @@ int devlink_param_driverinit_value_set(struct devlink *devlink, u32 param_id,
> void devlink_param_value_changed(struct devlink *devlink, u32 param_id);
> void devlink_param_value_str_fill(union devlink_param_value *dst_val,
> const char *src);
>+int devlink_port_params_register(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ const struct devlink_param *params,
>+ size_t params_count);
>+void devlink_port_params_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ const struct devlink_param *params,
>+ size_t params_count);
> struct devlink_region *devlink_region_create(struct devlink *devlink,
> const char *region_name,
> u32 region_max_snapshots,
>@@ -816,6 +830,21 @@ static inline bool devlink_dpipe_table_counter_enabled(struct devlink *devlink,
> {
> }
>
>+static inline int
>+devlink_port_params_register(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ const struct devlink_param *params,
>+ size_t params_count)
>+{
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static inline void
>+devlink_port_params_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ const struct devlink_param *params,
>+ size_t params_count)
>+{
>+}
>+
> static inline struct devlink_region *
> devlink_region_create(struct devlink *devlink,
> const char *region_name,
>diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>index abb0da9..e194913 100644
>--- a/net/core/devlink.c
>+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>@@ -3147,12 +3147,12 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_param_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
>
> static int devlink_param_register_one(struct devlink *devlink,
>+ struct list_head *param_list,
> const struct devlink_param *param)
> {
> struct devlink_param_item *param_item;
>
>- if (devlink_param_find_by_name(&devlink->param_list,
>- param->name))
>+ if (devlink_param_find_by_name(param_list, param->name))
> return -EEXIST;
>
> if (param->supported_cmodes == BIT(DEVLINK_PARAM_CMODE_DRIVERINIT))
>@@ -3165,24 +3165,54 @@ static int devlink_param_register_one(struct devlink *devlink,
> return -ENOMEM;
> param_item->param = param;
>
>- list_add_tail(¶m_item->list, &devlink->param_list);
>+ list_add_tail(¶m_item->list, param_list);
> devlink_param_notify(devlink, param_item, DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void devlink_param_unregister_one(struct devlink *devlink,
>+ struct list_head *param_list,
> const struct devlink_param *param)
> {
> struct devlink_param_item *param_item;
>
>- param_item = devlink_param_find_by_name(&devlink->param_list,
>- param->name);
>+ param_item = devlink_param_find_by_name(param_list, param->name);
> WARN_ON(!param_item);
> devlink_param_notify(devlink, param_item, DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_DEL);
> list_del(¶m_item->list);
> kfree(param_item);
> }
>
>+static const struct devlink_param devlink_port_param_generic[] = {};
>+
>+static int devlink_port_param_generic_verify(const struct devlink_param *param)
>+{
>+ /* verify it matches generic parameter by id and name */
>+ if (param->id > DEVLINK_PORT_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MAX)
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ if (strcmp(param->name, devlink_port_param_generic[param->id].name))
>+ return -ENOENT;
>+
>+ WARN_ON(param->type != devlink_port_param_generic[param->id].type);
>+
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int devlink_port_param_driver_verify(const struct devlink_param *param)
>+{
>+ int i;
>+
>+ if (param->id <= DEVLINK_PORT_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MAX)
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ /* verify no such name in generic params */
>+ for (i = 0; i <= DEVLINK_PORT_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_MAX; i++)
>+ if (!strcmp(param->name,
>+ devlink_port_param_generic[param->id].name))
>+ return -EEXIST;
>+
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
> static int devlink_nl_region_snapshot_id_put(struct sk_buff *msg,
> struct devlink *devlink,
> struct devlink_snapshot *snapshot)
>@@ -4503,7 +4533,8 @@ int devlink_params_register(struct devlink *devlink,
> if (err)
> goto rollback;
> }
>- err = devlink_param_register_one(devlink, param);
>+ err = devlink_param_register_one(devlink, &devlink->param_list,
>+ param);
> if (err)
> goto rollback;
> }
>@@ -4515,7 +4546,8 @@ int devlink_params_register(struct devlink *devlink,
> if (!i)
> goto unlock;
> for (param--; i > 0; i--, param--)
>- devlink_param_unregister_one(devlink, param);
>+ devlink_param_unregister_one(devlink, &devlink->param_list,
>+ param);
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
> return err;
>@@ -4537,7 +4569,8 @@ void devlink_params_unregister(struct devlink *devlink,
>
> mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
> for (i = 0; i < params_count; i++, param++)
>- devlink_param_unregister_one(devlink, param);
>+ devlink_param_unregister_one(devlink, &devlink->param_list,
>+ param);
> mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_params_unregister);
>@@ -4657,6 +4690,87 @@ void devlink_param_value_str_fill(union devlink_param_value *dst_val,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_param_value_str_fill);
>
> /**
>+ * devlink_port_params_register - register port configuration parameters
>+ *
>+ * @devlink_port: devlink port
>+ * @params: configuration parameters array
>+ * @params_count: number of parameters provided
>+ *
>+ * Register the configuration parameters supported by the port.
>+ */
>+int devlink_port_params_register(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ const struct devlink_param *params,
>+ size_t params_count)
>+{
>+ struct devlink *devlink = devlink_port->devlink;
>+ const struct devlink_param *param = params;
>+ int i, err;
>+
>+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink_port->param_list);
Driver can call devlink_port_params_register multiple times. You need to
move the list init into devlink_port_register()
>+ mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
>+ for (i = 0; i < params_count; i++) {
>+ if (!param || !param->name || !param->supported_cmodes) {
>+ err = -EINVAL;
>+ goto rollback;
>+ }
>+ if (param->generic) {
>+ err = devlink_port_param_generic_verify(param);
>+ if (err)
>+ goto rollback;
>+ } else {
>+ err = devlink_port_param_driver_verify(param);
This is duplicated code from devlink_params_register(). Once you use a
single enum for all params, you can push this into a common function for
both devlink_params_register() and devlink_port_params_register()
>+ if (err)
>+ goto rollback;
>+ }
>+ err = devlink_param_register_one(devlink_port->devlink,
>+ &devlink_port->param_list,
>+ param);
>+ if (err)
>+ goto rollback;
>+ }
>+
>+ mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
>+ return 0;
>+
>+rollback:
>+ if (!i)
>+ goto unlock;
>+ for (param--; i > 0; i--, param--)
>+ devlink_param_unregister_one(devlink_port->devlink,
>+ &devlink_port->param_list,
>+ param);
>+unlock:
>+ mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
>+ return err;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_params_register);
>+
>+/**
>+ * devlink_port_params_unregister - unregister port configuration
>+ * parameters
>+ *
>+ * @devlink_port: devlink port
>+ * @params: configuration parameters array
>+ * @params_count: number of parameters provided
>+ */
>+void devlink_port_params_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>+ const struct devlink_param *params,
>+ size_t params_count)
>+{
>+ struct devlink *devlink = devlink_port->devlink;
>+ const struct devlink_param *param = params;
>+ int i;
>+
>+ mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
>+ for (i = 0; i < params_count; i++, param++)
>+ devlink_param_unregister_one(devlink_port->devlink,
>+ &devlink_port->param_list,
>+ param);
In this case, not so much of duplication, but still, put into a common
function (to be symmetric to devlink_params_register() and
devlink_port_params_register()
>+ mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_params_unregister);
>+
>+/**
> * devlink_region_create - create a new address region
> *
> * @devlink: devlink
>--
>1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-05 5:56 [PATCH net-next RFC 0/7] Add configuration parameters support for devlink_port Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 1/7] devlink: Add devlink_param for port register and unregister Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 11:47 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2018-12-06 6:02 ` Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-06 7:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-06 7:26 ` Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-10 9:21 ` Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-10 11:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 2/7] devlink: Add port param get command Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 11:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 3/7] devlink: Add port param set command Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 12:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 4/7] devlink: Add support for get/set driverinit value for devlink_port Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 12:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 5/7] devlink: Add devlink notifications support for port params Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 13:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 6/7] devlink: Add a boolean generic port parameter Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 13:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:57 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 7/7] bnxt_en: Add bnxt_en initial port params table and register it Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 13:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 23:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 0:01 ` Michael Chan
2018-12-06 0:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 1:18 ` Michael Chan
2018-12-06 6:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 6:41 ` Michael Chan
2018-12-06 7:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 8:57 ` Michael Chan
2018-12-06 9:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-06 10:31 ` Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-06 11:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-06 10:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 11:00 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181205114751.GB2318@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).