From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com>
Cc: "michael.chan@broadcom.com" <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 7/7] bnxt_en: Add bnxt_en initial port params table and register it
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:11:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206111106.GK2318@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAACQVJr1Ke5A6MgocWNvv1QpRcd7hMFVLB56hHctHnQbFAu4_g@mail.gmail.com>
Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:31:26AM CET, vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:41 PM Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>>
>> Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:57:05AM CET, michael.chan@broadcom.com wrote:
>> >On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:11 PM Jakub Kicinski
>> ><jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:41:43 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > It will be in the BIOS only for a LOM, I think. For a NIC, it should
>> >> > be in the NIC's NVRAM.
>> >>
>> >> This is all vague. Could you please clearly state the use case.
>> >>
>> >Well, the WoL setting's use case should be quite simple, right? If
>> >the card's NVRAM WoL setting is ON, when you plug the card in a slot
>> >that has Vaux power, it will assert PME# when a magic packet is
>> >received. Again, the WoL setting in this context is similar to other
>> >power up settings such as PCIe Gen2 or Gen3.
>> >
>> >Let's say the power up setting is ON and it boots up to Linux for the
>> >first time after receiving a magic packet. The Linux user can then
>> >run ethtool -s to set the driver's non persistent WoL setting. It can
>> >be the same as the NVRAM's power up setting, or different. Ethtool
>> >may support additional WoL packet types that the power up setting does
>>
>> Wouldn't it make sense to also support multiple wol packet types in
>> devlink param, not just true/false? Your device may not support that but
>> others may. So enum instead of bool.
>There is no type enum in devlink types as of now. Instead it can be
>defined as u8 and
>a enum structure can be defined for wol types.
Yes.
>>
>>
>> >not support. Let's say the Linux user sets the ethtool WoL setting to
>> >OFF and shuts down the system. That card now will not wake up the
>> >system. But if there is a power failure and power comes back on
>> >later, the card will lose the ethtool setting and go back to the power
>> >up WoL setting, which is ON in this example.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-06 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-05 5:56 [PATCH net-next RFC 0/7] Add configuration parameters support for devlink_port Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 1/7] devlink: Add devlink_param for port register and unregister Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 11:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-06 6:02 ` Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-06 7:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-06 7:26 ` Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-10 9:21 ` Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-10 11:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 2/7] devlink: Add port param get command Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 11:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 3/7] devlink: Add port param set command Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 12:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 4/7] devlink: Add support for get/set driverinit value for devlink_port Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 12:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 5/7] devlink: Add devlink notifications support for port params Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 13:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:56 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 6/7] devlink: Add a boolean generic port parameter Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 13:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 5:57 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 7/7] bnxt_en: Add bnxt_en initial port params table and register it Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-05 13:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-05 23:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 0:01 ` Michael Chan
2018-12-06 0:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 1:18 ` Michael Chan
2018-12-06 6:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 6:41 ` Michael Chan
2018-12-06 7:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 8:57 ` Michael Chan
2018-12-06 9:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-12-06 10:31 ` Vasundhara Volam
2018-12-06 11:11 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2018-12-06 10:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-12-06 11:00 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181206111106.GK2318@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).