public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netfilter: ebtables: avoid resetting limit rule state
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:23:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210112322.rxndlqmfckctbhjm@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181209061405.15112-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>

Hi Linus,

On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 07:14:05AM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> So far any changes with ebtables will reset the state of limit rules,
> leading to spikes in traffic. This is especially noticeable if changes
> are done frequently, for instance via a daemon.
> 
> This patch fixes this by bailing out from (re)setting if the limit
> rule was initialized before.
> 
> When sending packets every 250ms for 600s, with a
> "--limit 1/sec --limit-burst 50" rule and a command like this
> in the background:
> 
> $ ebtables -N VOIDCHAIN
> $ while true; do ebtables -F VOIDCHAIN; sleep 30; done
> 
> The results are:
> 
> Before: ~1600 packets
> After: 650 packets
> 
> This also aligns the behavior to "xtables-nft-multi ebtables" which uses
> nft_limit instead of ebt_limit. In tests nft_limit did not suffer from
> this issue and rate limited to 650 just fine.
> 
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changelog v2:
> 
> - Adjusted commit message (adjusted title, added test results with
>   nft_limit for comparison)
> - Excluded rate limiting variables from zeroing when passed to userspace
>   by increasing .usersize. This became necessary with 4.11 /
>   commit ec2318904965 ("xtables: extend matches and targets with .usersize")
> - Retested with 4.20-rc4 and current net-next/master (83af01ba1c2d)
> 
> v1 was:
> 
> "[net-next] bridge: ebtables: Avoid resetting limit rule state"
> -> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/854802/
> ---
>  net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c
> index 165b9d678cf1..2cf9861c3bce 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ static int ebt_limit_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
>  {
>  	struct ebt_limit_info *info = par->matchinfo;
>  
> +	/* Do not reset state on unrelated table changes */
> +	if (info->prev)
> +		return 0;

Hm, still I don't think we can follow this path, even if it works.

This means we trust userspace in what it sets for info->prev.

Using ebtables-nft (instead of ebtables-legacy) fixes this problem,
without this patch.

> +
>  	/* Check for overflow. */
>  	if (info->burst == 0 ||
>  	    user2credits(info->avg * info->burst) < user2credits(info->avg)) {
> @@ -105,7 +109,7 @@ static struct xt_match ebt_limit_mt_reg __read_mostly = {
>  	.match		= ebt_limit_mt,
>  	.checkentry	= ebt_limit_mt_check,
>  	.matchsize	= sizeof(struct ebt_limit_info),
> -	.usersize	= offsetof(struct ebt_limit_info, prev),
> +	.usersize	= sizeof(struct ebt_limit_info),
>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>  	.compatsize	= sizeof(struct ebt_compat_limit_info),
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2018-12-10 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-09  6:14 [PATCH net-next v2] netfilter: ebtables: avoid resetting limit rule state Linus Lüssing
2018-12-10 11:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181210112322.rxndlqmfckctbhjm@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox