From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"antoine.tenart@bootlin.com" <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
"jaz@semihalf.com" <jaz@semihalf.com>,
"gregory.clement@bootlin.com" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
"linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
"nadavh@marvell.com" <nadavh@marvell.com>,
"thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"stefanc@marvell.com" <stefanc@marvell.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mvneta: fix operation for 64K PAGE_SIZE
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 02:48:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212104304.49026ed2@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544533009-12425-1-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com>
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:56:49 +0100 Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Recent changes in the mvneta driver reworked allocation
> and handling of the ingress buffers to use entire pages.
> Apart from that in SW BM scenario the HW must be informed
> via PRXDQS about the biggest possible incoming buffer
> that can be propagated by RX descriptors.
>
> The BufferSize field was filled according to the MTU-dependent
> pkt_size value. Later change to PAGE_SIZE broke RX operation
> when usin 64K pages, as the field is simply too small.
>
> This patch conditionally limits the value passed to the BufferSize
> of the PRXDQS register, depending on the PAGE_SIZE used.
> On the occasion remove now unused frag_size field of the mvneta_port
> structure.
>
> Fixes: 562e2f467e71 ("net: mvneta: Improve the buffer allocation
> method for SWBM")
IMHO, we'd better revert 562e2f467e71 and 7e47fd84b56bb
The issue commit 562e2f467e71 wants to solve is due to commit 7e47fd84b56bb
It looks a bit wired, to introduce regression then submit another commit(in
the same patch set) solve it
Per my test, after reverting 562e2f467e71 and 7e47fd84b56bb, I can't reproduce
what's claimed in commit 562e2f467e71 -- "With system having a small memory
(around 256MB), the state "cannot allocate memory to refill with new buffer"
is reach pretty quickly."
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index e5397c8..61b2349 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -408,7 +408,6 @@ struct mvneta_port {
> struct mvneta_pcpu_stats __percpu *stats;
>
> int pkt_size;
> - unsigned int frag_size;
> void __iomem *base;
> struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxqs;
> struct mvneta_tx_queue *txqs;
> @@ -2905,7 +2904,9 @@ static void mvneta_rxq_hw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> if (!pp->bm_priv) {
> /* Set Offset */
> mvneta_rxq_offset_set(pp, rxq, 0);
> - mvneta_rxq_buf_size_set(pp, rxq, pp->frag_size);
> + mvneta_rxq_buf_size_set(pp, rxq, PAGE_SIZE < SZ_64K ?
> + PAGE_SIZE :
> + MVNETA_RX_BUF_SIZE(pp->pkt_size));
> mvneta_rxq_bm_disable(pp, rxq);
> mvneta_rxq_fill(pp, rxq, rxq->size);
> } else {
> @@ -3760,7 +3761,6 @@ static int mvneta_open(struct net_device *dev)
> int ret;
>
> pp->pkt_size = MVNETA_RX_PKT_SIZE(pp->dev->mtu);
> - pp->frag_size = PAGE_SIZE;
>
> ret = mvneta_setup_rxqs(pp);
> if (ret)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 12:56 [PATCH net] net: mvneta: fix operation for 64K PAGE_SIZE Marcin Wojtas
2018-12-12 2:48 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2018-12-12 8:22 ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-12-12 9:25 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-12-12 11:04 ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-12-16 20:41 ` David Miller
2018-12-16 23:25 ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-12-17 7:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-12-19 3:11 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-12-19 9:24 ` Marcin Wojtas
2018-12-19 10:21 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181212104304.49026ed2@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=jaz@semihalf.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanc@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).