From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, andrew@lunn.ch, jiri@mellanox.com,
idosch@mellanox.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, cphealy@gmail.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] Documentation: networking: Clarify switchdev devices behavior
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:09:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212230943.757-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> (raw)
This patch provides details on the expected behavior of switchdev
enabled network devices when operating in a "stand alone" mode, as well
as when being bridge members. This clarifies a number of things that
recently came up during a bug fixing session on the b53 DSA switch
driver.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
Hi all,
Please review carefully, and let me know if you think some of the
behaviors described below do not make any sense. Thanks!
Documentation/networking/switchdev.txt | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/switchdev.txt b/Documentation/networking/switchdev.txt
index 82236a17b5e6..8c83174b477b 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/switchdev.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/switchdev.txt
@@ -392,3 +392,89 @@ switchdev_trans_item_dequeue()
If a transaction is aborted during "prepare" phase, switchdev code will handle
cleanup of the queued-up objects.
+
+Switchdev enabled network device expected behavior
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+Below is a set of defined behavior that switchdev enabled network device must be
+adhering to.
+
+Configuration less state
+------------------------
+
+Upon driver bring up, the network devices must be fully operational, and the
+backing driver must be configuring the network device such that it is possible
+to send and receive to this network device such that it is properly separate
+from other network devices/ports (e.g: as is frequenty with a switch ASIC). How
+this is achieved is heavily hardware dependent, but a simple solution can be to
+use per-port VLAN identifiers.
+
+The network device must be capable of running a full IP protocol stack must be
+working, including multicast, DHCP, IPv4/6, etc. If necessary, it should be
+programming the appropriate filters for VLAN, multicast, unicast etc. The
+underlying device driver must effectively be configured in a similar fashion to
+what it would do when IGMP snooping is enabled for IP multicast over these
+switchdev network devices and unsollicited multicast must be filtered as early
+as possible into the hardware.
+
+When configuring VLANs on top of the network device, all VLANs must be working,
+irrespective of the state of other network devices (e.g: other ports being part
+of a VLAN aware bridge doing ingress VID checking). See below for details.
+
+Bridged network devices
+-----------------------
+
+When a switchdev enabled network device is added as a bridge member, it should
+not be disrupting any functionality of non-bridged network devices and they
+should continue to behave as normal network devices. Depending on the bridge
+configuration knobs below, the expected behavior is documented.
+
+VLAN filtering
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The Linux bridge allows the configuration of a VLAN filtering mode (compile and
+run time) which must be observed by the underlying switchdev network
+device/hardware:
+
+- with VLAN filtering turned off: frames ingressing the device with a VID that
+ is not programmed into the bridge/switch's VLAN table must be forwarded.
+
+- with VLAN filtering turned on: frames ingressing the device with a VID that is
+ not programmed into the bridges/switch's VLAN table must be dropped.
+
+Non-bridged network ports of the same switch fabric must not be disturbed in any
+way, shape or form by the enabling of VLAN filtering.
+
+VLAN devices configured on top of a switchdev network device (e.g: sw0p1.100)
+which is a bridge port member must also observe the following behavior:
+
+- with VLAN filtering turned off, these VLAN devices must be fully functional
+ since the hardware is allowed VID frames
+
+- with VLAN filtering turned on, these VLAN devices are not going to be
+ functional unless the bridge's VLAN database is also configured to have that
+ VID enabled for the underlying network device/port
+ (e.g: bridge vlan add vid 100 dev sw0p1)
+
+Because VLAN filtering can be turned on/off at runtime, the switchdev driver
+must be able to re-configure the underlying hardware on the fly to honor the
+toggling of that option and behave appropriately.
+
+IGMP snooping
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The Linux bridge allows the configuration of IGMP snooping (compile and run
+time) which must be observed by the underlying switchdev network device/hardware
+in the following way:
+
+- when IGMP snooping is turned off, multicast traffic must be flooded to all
+ switch ports within the same broadcast domain, including the CPU/management
+ port of the switch (if handled separately).
+
+- when IGMP snooping is turned on, multicast traffic must be selectively flowing
+ to the appropriate network ports and not flood the entire switch, that must
+ include the CPU/management port.
+
+Because IGMP snooping can be turned on/off at runtime, the switchdev driver must
+be able to re-configure the underlying hardware on the fly to honor the toggling
+of that option and behave appropriately.
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 23:09 Florian Fainelli [this message]
2018-12-13 9:26 ` [PATCH net-next] Documentation: networking: Clarify switchdev devices behavior Andrew Lunn
2018-12-15 19:35 ` David Miller
2018-12-16 8:25 ` Ido Schimmel
2018-12-16 17:14 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-12-18 7:01 ` Ido Schimmel
2018-12-18 20:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-12-22 20:29 ` Ido Schimmel
2018-12-17 3:36 ` Florian Fainelli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-22 22:52 Florian Fainelli
2020-07-23 2:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-07-23 22:11 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-23 22:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-24 0:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181212230943.757-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cphealy@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).