From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: tja11xx: Add TJA11xx PHY driver
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 21:19:22 +0100
Message-ID: <20181214201922.GC21591@lunn.ch>
References: <20181213020150.17099-1-marex@denx.de>
 <20181213083812.GA1605@lunn.ch>
 <26001882-7e29-1e73-3259-656772d37ad9@denx.de>
 <20181213143352.GA12808@lunn.ch>
 <9a2f978a-eee9-e617-da5e-3c4cab55198b@denx.de>
 <20181214082313.GA3703@lunn.ch>
 <9b31e1ea-a6b5-02f8-6a27-0bfc27e55077@denx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:48171 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1729808AbeLNUTX (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:19:23 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9b31e1ea-a6b5-02f8-6a27-0bfc27e55077@denx.de>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

> >> Oh, nice. Shouldn't this be basic_t1 , which is already supported ?
> > 
> > I'm getting the various T mixed up. Yes, basic_t1.
> 
> Hmmm, is there a 10/Full variant of the T1 ?

10BaseT1 would be 802.3cg. There is also 100BaseT2, 100BaseT4 which
never really happened, 1000BaseT1 and 1000BaseT2.

	  Andrew