From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] 9p/net: implement asynchronous rpc
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:01:11 +0100
Message-ID: <20181217110111.GB17466@nautica>
References: <1544532108-21689-1-git-send-email-asmadeus@codewreck.org>
 <0da7d896-0d67-46f6-83f9-b346eba991a9@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@cea.fr>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0da7d896-0d67-46f6-83f9-b346eba991a9@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Tomas Bortoli wrote on Mon, Dec 17, 2018:
> sorry for the delay, I've been quite busy these days.

No problem.

> The patches looks good to me and should indeed speed up the code a bit.
> I quickly tested them against Syzkaller tuned for the 9p subsystem and
> everything seems fine.

Thanks, can I add your Reviewed-by on all three?

> And by the way, which refcount races?

There's a problem with trans_fd read_work and cancelled callback; I'm
not so sure about refcount but we can definitely get double list_del
as we're not checking the status. I think when we incorrectly remove
from the list we also mismanage the refcount, but honestly need to
test..

-- 
Dominique