From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
To: Ying Xu <yinxu@redhat.com>
Cc: liuhangbin@gmail.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: remove ipv6 zero address check in mcast queries
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181217131550.GP1713@otheros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALRz_Py6ogxQsnR-5w-92At1z51M76bgMAeO9A9xqhCFy1pApA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi and thanks for your reply!
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:32:16AM +0800, Ying Xu wrote:
> I think the scenario mentioned above is abnormal.
Can we agree, that this scenario, if switch A and B were using the
current bridge code, has issues right now which it did
not have before that patch?
I also do not quite understand what you mean with "abnormal". Do
you think that it is unlikely to have two snooping switches and
general queries with a 0.0.0.0 source?
Note that with the current bridge code and according to RFC3376
and RFC2236, as soon as a query with a 0.0.0.0 source is sent somewhere
in the broadcast domain, it will become the selected querier [*].
> The source of query indicats that is a real router or only a switch.(0.0.0.0
> means switch,non-zero means router).
> In the scenario above,the switch A was selected to be a querier that means A
> performs as a router,
> so switch A should config its query source address to non-zero,and then Host A
> can recieve the traffic from B.
Even if in the described scenario switch A were configured to use a a non-zero source
address to become a router, so that switch B would mark the port
to switch A as a multicast router port, switch A would still loose
in the querier election right now, as 0.0.0.0 is lower (RFC3376, RFC2236). So switch
B would then become the selected querier with its 0.0.0.0 source
and switch A would become silent even though it had a non-zero
source address.
And then we would have the same issue again, only swapped between
host+switch A and host+switch B.
Would you agree, does that make sense?
Regards, Linus
[*]: Looking at br_ip4_multicast_select_querier():
If previously selected querier were 0.0.0.0, it would accept any
source as a new querier ("!br->ip4_querier.addr.u.ip4"). However,
if the previously selected querier were non-zero, a query with
0.0.0.0 would win, too
("ntohl(saddr) <= ntohl(br->ip4_querier.addr.u.ip4)").
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-17 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-27 0:50 [net:master 17/19] net//bridge/br_multicast.c:1432:32: error: 'union <anonymous>' has no member named 'ip6'; did you mean 'ip4'? kbuild test robot
2018-10-27 7:10 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2018-10-27 9:07 ` [PATCH net] net: bridge: remove ipv6 zero address check in mcast queries Nikolay Aleksandrov
2018-10-28 15:20 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2018-10-28 16:09 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2018-10-29 1:33 ` Hangbin Liu
2018-12-13 16:10 ` [Bridge] " Linus Lüssing
2018-12-14 2:32 ` Ying Xu
2018-12-17 13:15 ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2019-02-21 8:01 ` [Bridge] " Hangbin Liu
2019-02-21 13:20 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-22 7:57 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-02-22 11:16 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-22 12:49 ` Hangbin Liu
2018-10-29 2:18 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181217131550.GP1713@otheros \
--to=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=yinxu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).