From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export mm_update_next_owner function for vhost-net Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:41:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20181217204124-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1544676445-14897-1-git-send-email-gchen.guomin@gmail.com> <20181217113254.GA6971@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jason Wang , gchen , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Morton , Sudip Mukherjee , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Dominik Brodowski To: gchen chen Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:39:16AM +0800, gchen chen wrote: > Yes, I think so.  > and i think the point is that unuse_mm() can't directly set tsk->mm=NULL. So why can't unuse_mm call mm_update_next_owner? -- MST