From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Niklas Cassel Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] net: stmmac: Coalesce and tail addr fixes Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:02:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20181219120245.GA5205@centauri.lan> References: <20180918.194846.1887226614778546543.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, narmstrong@baylibre.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, vinod.koul@linaro.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:43486 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728292AbeLSMCv (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:02:51 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id q2-v6so6031237lji.10 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:02:49 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180918.194846.1887226614778546543.davem@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:48:46PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Jose Abreu > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 09:22:55 +0100 > > > The fix for coalesce timer and a fix in tail address setting that impacts > > XGMAC2 operation. > > > > The series is: > > Tested-by: Jerome Brunet > > on a113 s400 board (single queue) > > Series applied and queued up for -stable. Hello David, Jose, While it says that the series was queued up for -stable, only patch 2/2: 0431100b3d82 ("net: stmmac: Fixup the tail addr setting in xmit path") was queued up for 4.14 stable. patch 1/2: 8fce33317023 ("net: stmmac: Rework coalesce timer and fix multi-queue races") is missing in 4.14 stable, even though the fixes tag refers to a commit that was first included in v4.12. Patch 1/2 does not apply without conflicts. However, since this fixes multi-queue races, and appears to fix the irq coalescing implementation that has been giving us problems in the past: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/24/571 I suggest that we try to get this backported. If the conflicts are non-trivial, perhaps Jose can help with the backport to 4.14 stable? Kind regards, Niklas