netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 2/5] RDMA/core: Don't depend device ODP capabilities on kconfig option
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 23:22:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181220232247.GV29267@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181220175020.GD3940@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 07:50:20PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING
> > > > >  	if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, pg))
> > > > >  		props->device_cap_flags |= IB_DEVICE_ON_DEMAND_PAGING;
> > > > >  	props->odp_caps = dev->odp_caps;
> > > > > -#endif
> > > >
> > > > But shouldn't this be protected? If the driver has compiled out ODP it
> > > > shouldn't set the cap flag...
> > >
> > > I see those capabilities as device properties and not as kernel ones.
> > >
> > > Current situation looks bad for me, when I have same device which
> > > reports differently information depends on some compilation flag.
> >
> > It is not device capabilities, it is a kernel API capability if the
> > API is not available the bit should not be set.
> 
> Is it better? Should I resend the series?

Hrm.. I think I'm inclined to keep the the if() in the same place as
the ifdefs. We can revise it later.

I noticed other busted up stuff:
 - IB_DEVICE_ON_DEMAND_PAGING is apparently UAPI but not in a uapi
   header (grr)
 - ucontext shouldn't have a driver callback, that should be moved to
   ops (ie to mlx5_ib_dev_odp_ops)
 - IB_DEVICE_ON_DEMAND_PAGING should be set in core code based
   on ops.invalidate_range being present, drivers shouldn't set it..

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-20 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-20  9:23 [PATCH rdma-next 0/5] Cleanup of CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING usage Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH rdma-next 1/5] RDMA: Clean structures from CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH rdma-next 2/5] RDMA/core: Don't depend device ODP capabilities on kconfig option Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20 17:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-20 17:29     ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20 17:33       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-20 17:50         ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20 23:22           ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH rdma-next 3/5] RDMA/mlx5: Introduce and reuse helper to identify ODP MR Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH rdma-next 4/5] RDMA/mlx5: Embed into the code flow the ODP config option Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-20  9:23 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 5/5] RDMA/mlx5: Delete declaration of already removed function Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-21  3:32 ` [PATCH rdma-next 0/5] Cleanup of CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING usage Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-21 13:59   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-21 16:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-22  9:18       ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181220232247.GV29267@mellanox.com \
    --to=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=haggaie@mellanox.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).