From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] net: dsa: microchip: add KSZ9477 I2C driver
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:29:58 +0300
Message-ID: <20181221092958.GA2240@kadam>
References: <1545190897-22622-1-git-send-email-Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>
 <20181219100532.GA2066@nanopsycho>
 <20181219160857.GA13878@amd>
 <20181219161532.GA2224@nanopsycho>
 <20181219172220.GA14258@amd>
 <63e9dd4b-33c0-a08b-2db1-dea81bdb97ac@denx.de>
 <SN1PR11MB0446158DF61F0137E980AA56ECBE0@SN1PR11MB0446.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: marex@denx.de, pavel@denx.de, jiri@resnulli.us, andrew@lunn.ch,
        sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Tristram.Ha@microchip.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:42754 "EHLO
        userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1730198AbeLUJau (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:30:50 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR11MB0446158DF61F0137E980AA56ECBE0@SN1PR11MB0446.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:50:16PM +0000, Tristram.Ha@microchip.com wrote:
>
> So if I change the new code, should I go back to correct the old code?

Other operating systems would worry about breaking code which is working
fine, but re-writing ancient code is The Linux Way.

regards,
dan carpenter