From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: thoughts stac/clac and get user for vhost Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 11:41:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20181225113301-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Wang Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52894 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725820AbeLYQlO (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Dec 2018 11:41:14 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E9285A04 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2018 16:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi! I was just wondering: packed ring batches things naturally. E.g. user_access_begin check descriptor valid smp_rmb copy descriptor user_access_end So packed layout should show the gain with this approach. That could be motivation enough to finally enable vhost packed ring support. Thoughts? -- MST