From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] bridge: fdb: Use 'struct ndmsg' for FDB dumping
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 07:55:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190101055549.GA5063@splinter.mtl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181231202538.47f58387@shemminger-XPS-13-9360>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 08:25:38PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:03:47 -0700
> David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/30/18 10:14 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > Since commit aea41afcfd6d ("ip bridge: Set NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK on
> > > socket") iproute2 uses strict checking on kernels that support it. This
> > > causes FDB dumping to fail [1], as iproute2 uses 'struct ifinfomsg'
> > > whereas the kernel expects 'struct ndmsg'.
> > >
> > > Note that with this change iproute2 continues to work on old kernels
> > > that do not support strict checking, but contain the fix introduced in
> > > kernel commit bd961c9bc664 ("rtnetlink: fix rtnl_fdb_dump() for ndmsg
> > > header").
>
> Sorry, I don't think that is good enough backward compatibility guarantee.
> Iproute2 should work on really old kernels like 2.6.32. If not then then iproute2
> utility is broken or the changes to the kernel API were incorrect.
I found two more issues for which I have patches. I tested with and
without strict checking and I'll test on some old kernels as well. No
intention to break backward compatibility. Will Cc you.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-01 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-30 17:14 [PATCH iproute2-next] bridge: fdb: Use 'struct ndmsg' for FDB dumping Ido Schimmel
2018-12-31 1:03 ` David Ahern
2019-01-01 4:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-01 5:55 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190101055549.GA5063@splinter.mtl.com \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).