From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tun: hold napi_mutex for all napi operations
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:02:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190107210231.GB14250@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iJjiQY8SVwTno_Uph5ukhVev5PfywR-xDqhC=EhmzPbbw@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/07, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 12:02 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000d1
> > Call Trace:
> > ? napi_gro_frags+0xa7/0x2c0
> > tun_get_user+0xb50/0xf20
> > tun_chr_write_iter+0x53/0x70
> > new_sync_write+0xff/0x160
> > vfs_write+0x191/0x1e0
> > __x64_sys_write+0x5e/0xd0
> > do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> >
> > I think there is a subtle race between sending a packet via tap and
> > attaching it:
> >
> > CPU0: CPU1:
> > tun_chr_ioctl(TUNSETIFF)
> > tun_set_iff
> > tun_attach
> > rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, tun);
> > tun_fops->write_iter()
> > tun_chr_write_iter
> > tun_napi_alloc_frags
> > napi_get_frags
> > napi->skb = napi_alloc_skb
> > tun_napi_init
> > netif_napi_add
> > napi->skb = NULL
> > napi->skb is NULL here
> > napi_gro_frags
> > napi_frags_skb
> > skb = napi->skb
> > skb_reset_mac_header(skb)
> > panic()
> >
> > To fix, do the following:
> > * Move rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, tun) to be the last thing we do
> > in tun_attach(); this should guarantee that when we call tun_get()
> > we always get an initialized object
> > * As another safeguard, always grab napi_mutex whenever doing any
> > napi operation; this should prevent napi state change between
> > calls to napi_get_frags and napi_gro_frags
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
> > Fixes: 90e33d459407 ("tun: enable napi_gro_frags() for TUN/TAP driver")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/tun.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > index a4fdad475594..7875f06011f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > @@ -323,22 +323,30 @@ static void tun_napi_init(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> > tfile->napi_enabled = napi_en;
> > tfile->napi_frags_enabled = napi_en && napi_frags;
> > if (napi_en) {
> > + mutex_lock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> > netif_napi_add(tun->dev, &tfile->napi, tun_napi_poll,
> > NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT);
> > napi_enable(&tfile->napi);
> > + mutex_unlock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > static void tun_napi_disable(struct tun_file *tfile)
> > {
> > - if (tfile->napi_enabled)
> > + if (tfile->napi_enabled) {
> > + mutex_lock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> > napi_disable(&tfile->napi);
> > + mutex_unlock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static void tun_napi_del(struct tun_file *tfile)
> > {
> > - if (tfile->napi_enabled)
> > + if (tfile->napi_enabled) {
> > + mutex_lock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> > netif_napi_del(&tfile->napi);
> > + mutex_unlock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static bool tun_napi_frags_enabled(const struct tun_file *tfile)
> > @@ -856,7 +864,6 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file,
> > err = 0;
> > }
> >
> > - rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, tun);
> > rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues], tfile);
> > tun->numqueues++;
> >
> > @@ -876,6 +883,11 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file,
> > * refcnt.
> > */
> >
> > + /* All tun_fops depend on tun_get() returning non-null pointer.
> > + * Thus, assigning tun to a tfile should be the last init operation,
> > + * otherwise we risk using half-initialized object.
> > + */
> > + rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, tun);
> > out:
> > return err;
> > }
>
> Hmmm I believe the issue is different : We need to call
> tun_napi_init() before doing the publish in the tun->tfiles[] array
>
> My patch was :
Still fails with your patch.
Maybe the best way is to move both of those publishes (tfile->tun and
tun->tfiles[]) to the end of tun_attach? It looks like tfile->tun
is a publish for syscall side (most of tun_socket_ops and tun_fops call
tun_get which looks at tun->dev and bail out if it's NULL) and tun->tfiles
is (mostly, but not really) for napi side.
Here is a repro I'm using if you want to poke it:
syz-execprog -threaded -collide -repeat=0 -procs=6 <rep.syz>
# See https://goo.gl/kgGztJ for information about syzkaller reproducers.
#{"threaded":true,"collide":true,"repeat":true,"procs":6,"sandbox":"none","fault_call":-1,"tun":true,"tmpdir":true,"cgroups":true,"netdev":true,"resetnet":true,"segv":true}
openat$tun(0xffffffffffffff9c, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
r0 = openat$tun(0xffffffffffffff9c,
&(0x7f0000001a00)='/dev/net/tun\x00', 0x0, 0x0)
ioctl$TUNSETIFF(r0, 0x400454ca, &(0x7f0000000300)={"6e72300100",
0x1132})
r1 = socket$kcm(0x2, 0x3, 0x2)
ioctl$PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER(r1, 0x8914,
&(0x7f0000000780)="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
d536a95d96f03d48596e008bf0a028b539cec796cec9bf585eb80fe3e0d26")
perf_event_open$cgroup(&(0x7f0000000440)={0x7, 0x70, 0x1, 0x0, 0x6e36,
0x38000000, 0x0, 0x1, 0x21060, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x20, 0x3, 0xfc50, 0x9,
0x8000, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x46c8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
0x0, 0x0, 0x8, 0x3f, 0x401, 0x8001, 0x8, 0x9, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1, 0x1,
@perf_config_ext={0x100000000, 0x6}, 0x10, 0x5, 0x2, 0x7,
0xfffffffffffffff9, 0x0, 0x7}, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x5,
0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0)
# 0x2 = O_RDWR
r2 = openat$tun(0xffffffffffffff9c,
&(0x7f0000001a00)='/dev/net/tun\x00', 0x2, 0x0)
# IFF_TAP 0x0002
# IFF_NAPI 0x0010
# IFF_NAPI_FRAGS 0x0020
# IFF_MULTI_QUEUE 0x0100
# IFF_MULTICAST = 0x1000
ioctl$TUNSETIFF(r2, 0x400454ca, &(0x7f0000000300)={"6e72300100",
0x1132})
write$cgroup_int(r2, &(0x7f0000000000), 0x17b)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index a4fdad47559462fbd049a89f880cc3fb33d1151d..dc751d1cbc21a2e2687c5739b44322cd64d0cb46
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -857,15 +857,15 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun,
> struct file *file,
> }
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, tun);
> + if (!tfile->detached) {
> + tun_napi_init(tun, tfile, napi, napi_frags);
> + sock_hold(&tfile->sk);
> + }
> rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues], tfile);
> tun->numqueues++;
>
> - if (tfile->detached) {
> + if (tfile->detached)
> tun_enable_queue(tfile);
> - } else {
> - sock_hold(&tfile->sk);
> - tun_napi_init(tun, tfile, napi, napi_frags);
> - }
>
> if (rtnl_dereference(tun->xdp_prog))
> sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_XDP);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-07 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-07 20:02 [PATCH net 1/2] tun: hold napi_mutex for all napi operations Stanislav Fomichev
2019-01-07 20:02 ` [PATCH net 2/2] tun: always set skb->dev to tun->dev Stanislav Fomichev
2019-01-07 20:22 ` [PATCH net 1/2] tun: hold napi_mutex for all napi operations Eric Dumazet
2019-01-07 21:02 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2019-01-07 21:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-01-07 21:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190107210231.GB14250@mini-arch \
--to=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).