[PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[Heiner Kallweit]

So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.

Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
index c33384710..7828d17f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
@@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static struct phy_driver ksphy_driver[] = {
 	.driver_data	= &ksz9021_type,
 	.probe		= kszphy_probe,
 	.config_init	= ksz9031_config_init,
+	.soft_reset	= genphy_soft_reset,
 	.read_status	= ksz9031_read_status,
 	.ack_interrupt	= kszphy_ack_interrupt,
 	.config_intr	= kszphy_config_intr,
-- 
2.20.1

Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[Florian Fainelli]

On 1/10/19 11:22 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
> didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
> mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
> KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.
> 
> Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Thanks a lot for following up with the people at TI on this. We should
really get a better understanding of what the issue is, and whether
there is a possibly better workaround that could be developed which is
not just as hard as a big hammer software reset. Maybe we can get some
people/contacts at Micrel to help here.

> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> index c33384710..7828d17f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> @@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static struct phy_driver ksphy_driver[] = {
>  	.driver_data	= &ksz9021_type,
>  	.probe		= kszphy_probe,
>  	.config_init	= ksz9031_config_init,
> +	.soft_reset	= genphy_soft_reset,
>  	.read_status	= ksz9031_read_status,
>  	.ack_interrupt	= kszphy_ack_interrupt,
>  	.config_intr	= kszphy_config_intr,
> 


-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[Heiner Kallweit]

On 10.01.2019 20:24, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/10/19 11:22 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
>> didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
>> mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
>> KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.
>>
>> Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
>> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> 
> Thanks a lot for following up with the people at TI on this. We should
> really get a better understanding of what the issue is, and whether
> there is a possibly better workaround that could be developed which is
> not just as hard as a big hammer software reset. Maybe we can get some
> people/contacts at Micrel to help here.
> 
In ksz9031_config_init() quite some settings are done and IMO it's not
that unusual that it takes a soft reset for such settings to become
effective. But I agree it would be nice if somebody from the PHY vendor
could comment on whether a soft reset is actually needed. Not sure who
has a contact to Microchip.

If the feedback takes time it may be better to apply the soft reset as
fix and replace it later in case we have a less intrusive option.

>> ---
>>  drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
>> index c33384710..7828d17f0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
>> @@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static struct phy_driver ksphy_driver[] = {
>>  	.driver_data	= &ksz9021_type,
>>  	.probe		= kszphy_probe,
>>  	.config_init	= ksz9031_config_init,
>> +	.soft_reset	= genphy_soft_reset,
>>  	.read_status	= ksz9031_read_status,
>>  	.ack_interrupt	= kszphy_ack_interrupt,
>>  	.config_intr	= kszphy_config_intr,
>>
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[Tony Lindgren]

* Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> [190110 19:41]:
> On 10.01.2019 20:24, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 1/10/19 11:22 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
> >> didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
> >> mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
> >> KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
> >> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Thanks a lot for following up with the people at TI on this. We should
> > really get a better understanding of what the issue is, and whether
> > there is a possibly better workaround that could be developed which is
> > not just as hard as a big hammer software reset. Maybe we can get some
> > people/contacts at Micrel to help here.
> > 
> In ksz9031_config_init() quite some settings are done and IMO it's not
> that unusual that it takes a soft reset for such settings to become
> effective. But I agree it would be nice if somebody from the PHY vendor
> could comment on whether a soft reset is actually needed. Not sure who
> has a contact to Microchip.

Adding Sekhar to Cc, maybe he has some contacts to ask.

> If the feedback takes time it may be better to apply the soft reset as
> fix and replace it later in case we have a less intrusive option.

Yes please let's fix the regression first and then patch
more later as needed.

Regards,

Tony

> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> >> index c33384710..7828d17f0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> >> @@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static struct phy_driver ksphy_driver[] = {
> >>  	.driver_data	= &ksz9021_type,
> >>  	.probe		= kszphy_probe,
> >>  	.config_init	= ksz9031_config_init,
> >> +	.soft_reset	= genphy_soft_reset,
> >>  	.read_status	= ksz9031_read_status,
> >>  	.ack_interrupt	= kszphy_ack_interrupt,
> >>  	.config_intr	= kszphy_config_intr,
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 

Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[Tony Lindgren]

* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [190110 13:27]:
> * Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> [190110 19:41]:
> > On 10.01.2019 20:24, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > On 1/10/19 11:22 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > >> So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
> > >> didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
> > >> mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
> > >> KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.
> > >>
> > >> Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
> > >> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > Thanks a lot for following up with the people at TI on this. We should
> > > really get a better understanding of what the issue is, and whether
> > > there is a possibly better workaround that could be developed which is
> > > not just as hard as a big hammer software reset. Maybe we can get some
> > > people/contacts at Micrel to help here.
> > > 
> > In ksz9031_config_init() quite some settings are done and IMO it's not
> > that unusual that it takes a soft reset for such settings to become
> > effective. But I agree it would be nice if somebody from the PHY vendor
> > could comment on whether a soft reset is actually needed. Not sure who
> > has a contact to Microchip.
> 
> Adding Sekhar to Cc, maybe he has some contacts to ask.

Oops.. Second attempt of adding Sekhar to Cc.

> > If the feedback takes time it may be better to apply the soft reset as
> > fix and replace it later in case we have a less intrusive option.
> 
> Yes please let's fix the regression first and then patch
> more later as needed.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 
> > >> ---
> > >>  drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 1 +
> > >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> > >> index c33384710..7828d17f0 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> > >> @@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static struct phy_driver ksphy_driver[] = {
> > >>  	.driver_data	= &ksz9021_type,
> > >>  	.probe		= kszphy_probe,
> > >>  	.config_init	= ksz9031_config_init,
> > >> +	.soft_reset	= genphy_soft_reset,
> > >>  	.read_status	= ksz9031_read_status,
> > >>  	.ack_interrupt	= kszphy_ack_interrupt,
> > >>  	.config_intr	= kszphy_config_intr,
> > >>
> > > 
> > > 
> > 

Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[Sekhar Nori]

On 11/01/19 2:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> [190110 19:41]:
>> On 10.01.2019 20:24, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 1/10/19 11:22 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>> So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
>>>> didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
>>>> mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
>>>> KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
>>>> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for following up with the people at TI on this. We should
>>> really get a better understanding of what the issue is, and whether
>>> there is a possibly better workaround that could be developed which is
>>> not just as hard as a big hammer software reset. Maybe we can get some
>>> people/contacts at Micrel to help here.
>>>
>> In ksz9031_config_init() quite some settings are done and IMO it's not
>> that unusual that it takes a soft reset for such settings to become
>> effective. But I agree it would be nice if somebody from the PHY vendor
>> could comment on whether a soft reset is actually needed. Not sure who
>> has a contact to Microchip.
> 
> Adding Sekhar to Cc, maybe he has some contacts to ask.

I dont have any direct contacts, but I will ask internally.

> 
>> If the feedback takes time it may be better to apply the soft reset as
>> fix and replace it later in case we have a less intrusive option.
> 
> Yes please let's fix the regression first and then patch
> more later as needed.

+1

I justed tested AM437x GP EVM with 10 times cable plug-unplug and this
fixes the regression.

Tested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>

Thanks,
Sekhar

Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[Tony Lindgren]

* Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> [190110 19:22]:
> So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
> didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
> mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
> KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.
> 
> Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Thanks this fixes the regression for me:

Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> index c33384710..7828d17f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> @@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static struct phy_driver ksphy_driver[] = {
>  	.driver_data	= &ksz9021_type,
>  	.probe		= kszphy_probe,
>  	.config_init	= ksz9031_config_init,
> +	.soft_reset	= genphy_soft_reset,
>  	.read_status	= ksz9031_read_status,
>  	.ack_interrupt	= kszphy_ack_interrupt,
>  	.config_intr	= kszphy_config_intr,
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[Florian Fainelli]

On January 10, 2019 11:22:26 AM PST, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
>So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
>didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
>mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
>KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.
>
>Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
>Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: set soft_reset callback to genphy_soft_reset for KSZ9031

[David Miller]

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:22:26 +0100

> So far genphy_soft_reset was used automatically if the PHY driver
> didn't implement the soft_reset callback. This changed with the
> mentioned commit and broke KSZ9031. To fix this configure the
> KSZ9031 PHY driver to use genphy_soft_reset.
> 
> Fixes: 6e2d85ec0559 ("net: phy: Stop with excessive soft reset")
> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Applied.