From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: fei phung <feiphung27@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, majordomo@vger.kernel.org, feiphung@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Question on ptr_ring linux header
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:48:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190115072916-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF8QhUh0bd+1=HH1LoH-SueSx4Dgp9YJ1mB-ovuUpsK4A7jrRw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:33:28PM +0800, fei phung wrote:
> Hi netdev mailing list and Michael,
>
> I am having problem getting proper ptr_ring operation where one
> ptr_ring entry (val1=2 for item_recv_pop) is missing from the void **
> queue
>
> Did I initialize the ring pointers (ptr_ring_init()) correctly ?
>
> See the following for more context:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/xWJOH1G.png
> https://gist.github.com/promach/7716ee8addcaa33fda140d74d1ad94d6#file-riffa_driver-c-L663
Didn't read in depth but
this one seems to poke at the internal producer index for its own
purposes. That's not something I expected when I built ptr_ring so
I don't know how well that will work. You might want to
try and come up with a reasonable API for that instead.
> https://gist.github.com/promach/65e9331d55a43a2815239430a28e29c6#file-circ_ring-c-L44
>
Hard to say for sure but things like that
inline int push_circ_queue(struct ptr_ring * buffer, struct item * item_push)
{
if (!ptr_ring_full_any(buffer)) // if (not full)
{
DEBUG_MSG(KERN_INFO "Pushing %u and %u\n", item_push->val1, item_push->val2);
/* insert one item into the buffer */
ptr_ring_produce_any(buffer, item_push);
are a waste, and they can be racy with multiple producers.
Just call ptr_ring_produce_any and it will tell you whether it
could produce.
same here:
inline int pop_circ_queue(struct ptr_ring * buffer, struct item * item_pop)
{
if (!ptr_ring_empty_any(buffer)) // if (not empty)
{
DEBUG_MSG(KERN_INFO "Before pop, head = %u , tail = %u\n", buffer->consumer_head, buffer->consumer_tail);
/* extract one item struct containing two unsigned integers from the buffer */
*item_pop = *((struct item *)ptr_ring_consume_any(buffer));
DEBUG_MSG(KERN_INFO "val1 = %u , val2 = %u\n", item_pop->val1, item_pop->val2);
DEBUG_MSG(KERN_INFO "After pop, head = %u , tail = %u\n", buffer->consumer_head, buffer->consumer_tail);
return 0;
}
else return 1; // empty, nothing to pop from the ring
}
racy if there are multiple consumers.
just call ptr_ring_consume_any.
And it seems to leak the memory the pointer to which you
have consumed - although it's possible it's freed elsewhere -
I wouldn't know.
> struct ptr_ring * init_circ_queue(int len)
> {
> struct ptr_ring * q;
>
> q = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ptr_ring), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (q == NULL) {
> DEBUG_MSG(KERN_ERR "Not enough memory to allocate ptr_ring");
> return NULL;
> }
>
> // creates an array of length 'len' where each array location
> can store a struct * item
> if(ptr_ring_init(q, len, GFP_KERNEL) != 0) {
> DEBUG_MSG(KERN_ERR "Not enough memory to allocate
> ptr_ring array");
> return NULL;
> }
>
> return q;
> }
>
This part looks good.
>
> while ((nomsg = pop_circ_queue(sc->recv[chnl]->msgs,
> &item_recv_pop))) {
> prepare_to_wait(&sc->recv[chnl]->waitq, &wait,
> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> // Another check before we schedule.
> if ((nomsg =
> pop_circ_queue(sc->recv[chnl]->msgs, &item_recv_pop)))
> tymeout = schedule_timeout(tymeout);
> finish_wait(&sc->recv[chnl]->waitq, &wait);
> if (signal_pending(current)) {
> free_sg_buf(sc, sc->recv[chnl]->sg_map_0);
> free_sg_buf(sc, sc->recv[chnl]->sg_map_1);
> return -ERESTARTSYS;
> }
> if (!nomsg)
> break;
> if (tymeout == 0) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "riffa: fpga:%d
> chnl:%d, recv timed out\n", sc->id, chnl);
> /*free_sg_buf(sc, sc->recv[chnl]->sg_map_0);
> free_sg_buf(sc, sc->recv[chnl]->sg_map_1);
> return (unsigned int)(recvd>>2);*/
> }
> }
> tymeout = tymeouto;
> msg_type = item_recv_pop.val1;
> msg = item_recv_pop.val2;
> DEBUG_MSG(KERN_INFO "recv msg_type: %u\n", msg_type);
>
>
> Regards,
> Phung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-15 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-15 4:33 Question on ptr_ring linux header fei phung
2019-01-15 12:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-15 17:10 fei phung
2019-01-15 18:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <SG2PR06MB3176FA4C12888C84990F109BC1820@SG2PR06MB3176.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
2019-01-16 14:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-16 7:00 fei phung
2019-01-17 3:51 fei phung
2019-01-31 5:16 ` fei phung
2019-01-31 14:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-01 8:12 ` fei phung
2019-02-01 15:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-15 3:03 ` fei phung
2019-03-01 3:20 ` fei phung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190115072916-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=feiphung27@gmail.com \
--cc=feiphung@hotmail.com \
--cc=majordomo@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).