netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 7/9] perf tools: synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:51:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190122145119.GF27625@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190122143117.GG14973@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:31:17PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:13:20PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:46:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:15:19AM -0800, Song Liu escreveu:
> > > > This patch synthesize PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL and PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT for
> > > > BPF programs loaded before perf-record. This is achieved by gathering
> > > > information about all BPF programs via sys_bpf.
> > > 
> > > Ditto
> > 
> > This is breaking 'perf sched', see below, the fix seems trivial:
> > 
> > [root@quaco ~]# perf sched record -a sleep 2
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > 0x5b60 [0x138]: failed to process type: 17
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.539 MB perf.data ]
> > [root@quaco ~]# perf sched lat
> > 0x5b60 [0x138]: failed to process type: 17
> > Failed to process events, error -22
> > [root@quaco ~]#
> 
> So:
> 
>    perf_session__process_event (event->header.type = 17 (PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL)
>      if (tool->ordered_events)
>        ret = perf_evlist__parse_sample_timestamp(evlist, event, &timestamp);
>        if (ret && ret != -1)
>             return ret;
> 
> So it returns here with -EFAULT, i.e. this is failing:
> 
> int perf_evlist__parse_sample_timestamp(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>                                         union perf_event *event,
>                                         u64 *timestamp)
> {
>         struct perf_evsel *evsel = perf_evlist__event2evsel(evlist, event);
> 
>         if (!evsel)
>                 return -EFAULT;
>         return perf_evsel__parse_sample_timestamp(evsel, event, timestamp);
> }
> 
> It isn't mapping the event ID it finds back to an evsel.. Jiri, ideas?
> 
> This is happening so far only for 'perf sched', perf record with two
> events works.

I saw also perf mem failing because of this.. will check

jirka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-22 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-17 16:15 [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 0/9] reveal invisible bpf programs Song Liu
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 1/9] perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL Song Liu
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 2/9] sync tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h Song Liu
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 3/9] perf, bpf: introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT Song Liu
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 4/9] sync tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h Song Liu
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 5/9] perf util: handle PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL Song Liu
2019-01-18 14:45   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 6/9] perf util: handle PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT Song Liu
2019-01-18 14:46   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 7/9] perf tools: synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs Song Liu
2019-01-18 14:46   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-01-22 14:13     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-01-22 14:31       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-01-22 14:48         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-01-22 14:51         ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-01-22 14:58           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-01-22 15:21             ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-22 18:38               ` Song Liu
2019-01-22 19:15                 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-22 19:24                   ` Song Liu
2019-01-22 19:44                     ` Jiri Olsa
2019-01-24  9:49                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 8/9] perf top: Synthesize BPF events for pre-existing " Song Liu
2019-01-17 16:15 ` [PATCH v11 perf, bpf-next 9/9] bpf: add module name [bpf] to ksymbols for bpf programs Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190122145119.GF27625@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).