Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: yhs@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com,
	kafai@fb.com, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/12] nfp: bpf: support optimizing dead branches
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:45:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190123064529.13518-12-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123064529.13518-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>

Verifier will now optimize out branches to dead code, implement
the replace_insn callback to take advantage of that optimization.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h | 14 ++++++++
 .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c  |  1 +
 .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h
index 07879eee3d46..a33aa7df1979 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h
@@ -412,6 +412,17 @@ static inline bool is_mbpf_div(const struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
 	return is_mbpf_alu(meta) && mbpf_op(meta) == BPF_DIV;
 }
 
+static inline bool is_mbpf_cond_jump(const struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
+{
+	u8 op;
+
+	if (BPF_CLASS(meta->insn.code) != BPF_JMP)
+		return false;
+
+	op = BPF_OP(meta->insn.code);
+	return op != BPF_JA && op != BPF_EXIT && op != BPF_CALL;
+}
+
 static inline bool is_mbpf_helper_call(const struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
 {
 	struct bpf_insn insn = meta->insn;
@@ -520,6 +531,9 @@ int nfp_verify_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx,
 		    int prev_insn_idx);
 int nfp_bpf_finalize(struct bpf_verifier_env *env);
 
+int nfp_bpf_opt_replace_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off,
+			     struct bpf_insn *insn);
+
 extern const struct bpf_prog_offload_ops nfp_bpf_dev_ops;
 
 struct netdev_bpf;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
index c10aab392cf6..877c1b8f95e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
@@ -592,6 +592,7 @@ int nfp_net_bpf_offload(struct nfp_net *nn, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 const struct bpf_prog_offload_ops nfp_bpf_dev_ops = {
 	.insn_hook	= nfp_verify_insn,
 	.finalize	= nfp_bpf_finalize,
+	.replace_insn	= nfp_bpf_opt_replace_insn,
 	.prepare	= nfp_bpf_verifier_prep,
 	.translate	= nfp_bpf_translate,
 	.destroy	= nfp_bpf_destroy,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c
index 2712ab17d57c..32468e1b1b73 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -786,3 +786,37 @@ int nfp_bpf_finalize(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+int nfp_bpf_opt_replace_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off,
+			     struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+	struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog = env->prog->aux->offload->dev_priv;
+	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux_data = env->insn_aux_data;
+	struct nfp_insn_meta *meta = nfp_prog->verifier_meta;
+
+	meta = nfp_bpf_goto_meta(nfp_prog, meta, aux_data[off].orig_idx);
+	nfp_prog->verifier_meta = meta;
+
+	/* conditional jump to jump conversion */
+	if (is_mbpf_cond_jump(meta) &&
+	    insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA | BPF_K)) {
+		unsigned int tgt_off;
+
+		tgt_off = off + insn->off + 1;
+
+		if (!insn->off) {
+			meta->jmp_dst = list_next_entry(meta, l);
+			meta->jump_neg_op = false;
+		} else if (meta->jmp_dst->n != aux_data[tgt_off].orig_idx) {
+			pr_vlog(env, "branch hard wire at %d changes target %d -> %d\n",
+				off, meta->jmp_dst->n,
+				aux_data[tgt_off].orig_idx);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	pr_vlog(env, "unsupported instruction replacement %hhx -> %hhx\n",
+		meta->insn.code, insn->code);
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
-- 
2.19.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-23  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-23  6:45 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/12] bpf: dead code elimination Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/12] bpf: change parameters of call/branch offset adjustment Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/12] bpf: verifier: hard wire branches to dead code Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/12] bpf: verifier: remove " Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/12] bpf: verifier: remove unconditional branches by 0 Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/12] selftests: bpf: add tests for dead code removal Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/12] bpf: verifier: record original instruction index Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/12] bpf: notify offload JITs about optimizations Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/12] nfp: bpf: don't use instruction number for jump target Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/12] nfp: bpf: split up the skip flag Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/12] nfp: bpf: save original program length Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-23  6:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-01-23  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/12] nfp: bpf: support removing dead code Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-24  1:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/12] bpf: dead code elimination Alexei Starovoitov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-19 18:06 [PATCH bpf-next v4 " Jakub Kicinski
2019-01-19 18:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/12] nfp: bpf: support optimizing dead branches Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190123064529.13518-12-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox