From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D800C282C4 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3412175B for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="AC6ZzNRi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726902AbfBGQ1J (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:27:09 -0500 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:45110 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726319AbfBGQ1I (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:27:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2014; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=e1gr0vv+5Gj5JX7Lj4Mbqj00ui75u4QG9qC6bfiq+gQ=; b=AC6ZzNRiU3iIcVuSAMN46gNH4 qJ6O6daIXRMKwGJc/6wJyV54jgKeJ6ZHUQmCs4EF4zPpBI7npYAS/Q2oT/0mX2Hz6q0svtiztabGE 6ohfQQcCPc8EjX1GDDh2StKRT2/PQZxkTB7U2C7GYKV2x/0sayGih6ZG9jt1L9Yzw54lU=; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:36606) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1grmW1-0002WU-IK; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:27:05 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grmW0-0006K6-9f; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:27:04 +0000 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:27:04 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: David Miller Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: phylink: update mac_config() documentation Message-ID: <20190207162704.ww3q5ptts7jfhfay@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190206.173032.1315062430415479623.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190206.173032.1315062430415479623.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:30:32PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > These two patches do not apply cleanly to net nor net-next. > > Please send me something that does apply, and please always > clearly indicate which tree your changes are targetting. I've just tried this patch on current net-next, and there does not seem to be any problem. What problem are you seeing specifically with this patch? Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up