From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=TiMe=QP=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,
	URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D37C169C4
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  8 Feb 2019 20:20:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D142177B
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  8 Feb 2019 20:20:26 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="xiTcMhTo"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727553AbfBHUUZ (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 8 Feb 2019 15:20:25 -0500
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:44592 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1727106AbfBHUUZ (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 8 Feb 2019 15:20:25 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
        Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
        List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=nMaXGT9O9NZzidJOBLBNQB2CuNk2QaEJzGyPN3ssM3c=; b=xiTcMhToBrTrgSqwa85ZH/YanD
        NlEK606mhDKaNkHORIgifAT7uthO3f68YVuMqnlBiGyOGL9vw9xeLhT6ov2P0A9vbgA6qin3+kO0G
        WiPgyvoY/6KfMrgDSo9Uu8VTDYIF0sGIwlWt8GzvZOnCXHNokCA3NgENILy3JluPtuRQ=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1gsCdK-0002V7-RJ; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 21:20:22 +0100
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 21:20:22 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3 net-next] net: phy: disregard "Clause 22 registers
 present" bit in get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg
Message-ID: <20190208202022.GJ1853@lunn.ch>
References: <75c9d8ee-582f-f247-7595-d8732ac26c20@gmail.com>
 <ff374a57-3976-020f-feb5-49a45662b56c@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ff374a57-3976-020f-feb5-49a45662b56c@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Bit 0 in register 1.5 doesn't represent a device but is a flag that
> Clause 22 registers are present. Therefore disregard this bit when
> populating the device list. If code needs this information it
> should read register 1.5 directly instead of accessing the device
> list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

    Andrew