From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Tristram.Ha@microchip.com
Cc: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/4] net: dsa: microchip: prepare PHY for proper advertisement
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 17:54:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190209165453.GD30856@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549598829-25970-2-git-send-email-Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>
> +static void ksz9477_phy_setup(struct ksz_device *dev, int port,
> + struct phy_device *phy)
> +{
> + /* ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Pause_BIT and ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT
> + * can be removed to disable flow control when rate limiting is used.
> + */
> + if (port < dev->phy_port_cnt) {
> + /* The MAC actually cannot run in 1000 half-duplex mode. */
> + phy_remove_link_mode(phy,
> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT);
> + }
Hi Tristram
The comment about pause does not seem to match the code.
> +}
> +
> static void ksz9477_port_setup(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, bool cpu_port)
> {
> u8 data8;
> @@ -1151,6 +1164,7 @@ static int ksz9477_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> .setup = ksz9477_setup,
> .phy_read = ksz9477_phy_read16,
> .phy_write = ksz9477_phy_write16,
> + .adjust_link = ksz_adjust_link,
> .port_enable = ksz_enable_port,
> .port_disable = ksz_disable_port,
> .get_strings = ksz9477_get_strings,
> @@ -1298,6 +1312,7 @@ static void ksz9477_switch_exit(struct ksz_device *dev)
> .get_port_addr = ksz9477_get_port_addr,
> .cfg_port_member = ksz9477_cfg_port_member,
> .flush_dyn_mac_table = ksz9477_flush_dyn_mac_table,
> + .phy_setup = ksz9477_phy_setup,
> .port_setup = ksz9477_port_setup,
> .shutdown = ksz9477_reset_switch,
> .detect = ksz9477_switch_detect,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> index 8a5111f..a57bda7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> /*
> * Microchip switch driver main logic
> *
> - * Copyright (C) 2017-2018 Microchip Technology Inc.
> + * Copyright (C) 2017-2019 Microchip Technology Inc.
> */
>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -61,6 +61,22 @@ int ksz_phy_write16(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg, u16 val)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ksz_phy_write16);
>
> +void ksz_adjust_link(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> + struct ksz_device *dev = ds->priv;
> + struct ksz_port *p = &dev->ports[port];
> +
> + if (phydev->link) {
> + dev->live_ports |= (1 << port) & dev->on_ports;
> + } else if (p->phydev.link) {
> + p->link_just_down = 1;
> + dev->live_ports &= ~(1 << port);
> + }
It is not very easy to understand what on_ports, live_ports and
link_just_down are all about. Could you simplify this, and make the
code symmetric? ksz_enable_port does not touch any of these, but
ksz_disable_port does?
grep live_ports *
ksz9477.c: dev->live_ports = dev->host_mask;
ksz9477.c: dev->live_ports |= (1 << port);
ksz_common.c: dev->live_ports &= ~(1 << port);
ksz_priv.h: u16 live_ports;
So live_ports is not actually used for anything.
> + p->phydev = *phydev;
This last statement seems like it belongs in phy_setup, which gets
called as part of port_enable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-09 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 4:07 [PATCH v1 net-next 0/4] net: dsa: microchip: add MIB counters support Tristram.Ha
2019-02-08 4:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 1/4] net: dsa: microchip: prepare PHY for proper advertisement Tristram.Ha
2019-02-09 16:54 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2019-02-08 4:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 2/4] net: dsa: microchip: add MIB counter reading support Tristram.Ha
2019-02-09 17:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-02-13 2:39 ` Tristram.Ha
2019-02-13 3:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-02-13 3:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 19:26 ` Tristram.Ha
2019-02-14 19:33 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-20 23:49 ` Joe Perches
2019-02-25 18:34 ` Pavel Machek
2019-02-08 4:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 3/4] net: dsa: microchip: use readx_poll_time for polling Tristram.Ha
2019-02-09 17:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-02-13 2:53 ` Tristram.Ha
2019-02-08 4:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 4/4] net: dsa: microchip: remove unnecessary include headers Tristram.Ha
2019-02-09 17:01 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190209165453.GD30856@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).