From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: [Patch net v2 2/3] net_sched: fix a memory leak in cls_tcindex
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:06:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211210616.9592-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211210616.9592-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
When tcindex_destroy() destroys all the filter results in
the perfect hash table, it invokes the walker to delete
each of them. However, results with class==0 are skipped
in either tcindex_walk() or tcindex_delete(), which causes
a memory leak reported by kmemleak.
This patch fixes it by skipping the walker and directly
deleting these filter results so we don't miss any filter
result.
As a result of this change, we have to initialize exts->net
properly in tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(). For net-next, we
need to consider whether we should initialize ->net in
tcf_exts_init() instead, before that just directly test
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT=y.
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
net/sched/cls_tcindex.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c b/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
index 79b52a637dda..70ea5b1a7889 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
@@ -221,14 +221,6 @@ static int tcindex_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *arg, bool *last,
return 0;
}
-static int tcindex_destroy_element(struct tcf_proto *tp,
- void *arg, struct tcf_walker *walker)
-{
- bool last;
-
- return tcindex_delete(tp, arg, &last, NULL);
-}
-
static void tcindex_destroy_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct tcindex_data *p = container_of(to_rcu_work(work),
@@ -279,7 +271,7 @@ static void tcindex_free_perfect_hash(struct tcindex_data *cp)
kfree(cp->perfect);
}
-static int tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(struct tcindex_data *cp)
+static int tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(struct net *net, struct tcindex_data *cp)
{
int i, err = 0;
@@ -293,6 +285,9 @@ static int tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(struct tcindex_data *cp)
TCA_TCINDEX_ACT, TCA_TCINDEX_POLICE);
if (err < 0)
goto errout;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
+ cp->perfect[i].exts.net = net;
+#endif
}
return 0;
@@ -341,7 +336,7 @@ tcindex_set_parms(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long base,
if (p->perfect) {
int i;
- if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(cp) < 0)
+ if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(net, cp) < 0)
goto errout;
for (i = 0; i < cp->hash; i++)
cp->perfect[i].res = p->perfect[i].res;
@@ -410,7 +405,7 @@ tcindex_set_parms(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long base,
err = -ENOMEM;
if (!cp->perfect && !cp->h) {
if (valid_perfect_hash(cp)) {
- if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(cp) < 0)
+ if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(net, cp) < 0)
goto errout_alloc;
balloc = 1;
} else {
@@ -566,13 +561,32 @@ static void tcindex_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct tcindex_data *p = rtnl_dereference(tp->root);
- struct tcf_walker walker;
+ int i;
pr_debug("tcindex_destroy(tp %p),p %p\n", tp, p);
- walker.count = 0;
- walker.skip = 0;
- walker.fn = tcindex_destroy_element;
- tcindex_walk(tp, &walker);
+
+ if (p->perfect) {
+ for (i = 0; i < p->hash; i++) {
+ struct tcindex_filter_result *r = p->perfect + i;
+
+ tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &r->res);
+ if (tcf_exts_get_net(&r->exts))
+ tcf_queue_work(&r->rwork,
+ tcindex_destroy_rexts_work);
+ else
+ __tcindex_destroy_rexts(r);
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; p->h && i < p->hash; i++) {
+ struct tcindex_filter *f, *next;
+ bool last;
+
+ for (f = rtnl_dereference(p->h[i]); f; f = next) {
+ next = rtnl_dereference(f->next);
+ tcindex_delete(tp, &f->result, &last, NULL);
+ }
+ }
tcf_queue_work(&p->rwork, tcindex_destroy_work);
}
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 21:06 [Patch net v2 0/3] net_sched: some fixes for cls_tcindex Cong Wang
2019-02-11 21:06 ` [Patch net v2 1/3] net_sched: fix a race condition in tcindex_destroy() Cong Wang
2019-02-11 21:06 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2019-02-11 21:06 ` [Patch net v2 3/3] net_sched: fix two more memory leaks in cls_tcindex Cong Wang
2019-02-12 19:14 ` [Patch net v2 0/3] net_sched: some fixes for cls_tcindex David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211210616.9592-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox