From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417E7C282C4 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1033E2190A for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:58:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550026739; bh=EdUZ2KYYrjVVx8f7o1JIrWaKS8nYu5WM1x7fNFyK2no=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=Gb2ic58lin5x8mn1rndMjxYFpxMFc5nwyaIlFCF67mIcAhFe9rkunDD/qOpLjHrrt cK21nDVWVYpvsYI8waaQOic+XOMGyR05fRTldyJVsWim6FkEhmf80918GLdwbENmlH 3BruzBWhT0ObaCp1lVIl0OJxRZwmsQGer3nhOLAc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728256AbfBMCg0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:36:26 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39958 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388109AbfBMCgW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:36:22 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07BE7222C2; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:36:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550025381; bh=EdUZ2KYYrjVVx8f7o1JIrWaKS8nYu5WM1x7fNFyK2no=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=d8AMEQL5wrXjXDvYHf0rQEnypjsq5gcOIlKi0RymvYtYt+TbOG+rtVhTh+1kZzrT+ FPpMgbChrTWw0feFCzn4H+VKBM5KZwHOCnWrjbmhzbLc+ZyowCGDBnTJ+N9hCkJvZC LqtbK2RwbanOdUyZng92UmDmO23SjPPgC3zN2THY= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stanislav Fomichev , Daniel Borkmann , Sasha Levin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 091/105] selftests/bpf: retry tests that expect build-id Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:33:22 -0500 Message-Id: <20190213023336.19019-91-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20190213023336.19019-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190213023336.19019-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Stanislav Fomichev [ Upstream commit f67ad87ab3120e82845521b18a2b99273a340308 ] While running test_progs in a loop I found out that I'm sometimes hitting "Didn't find expected build ID from the map" error. Looking at stack_map_get_build_id_offset() it seems that it is racy (by design) and can sometimes return BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP (i.e. can't trylock current->mm->mmap_sem). Let's retry this test a single time. Fixes: 13790d1cc72c ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with build_id in NMI context") Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c index 2d3c04f45530..998b6cc77ed6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c @@ -1136,7 +1136,9 @@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id(void) int i, j; struct bpf_stack_build_id id_offs[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH]; int build_id_matches = 0; + int retry = 1; +retry: err = bpf_prog_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, &obj, &prog_fd); if (CHECK(err, "prog_load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno)) goto out; @@ -1249,6 +1251,19 @@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id(void) previous_key = key; } while (bpf_map_get_next_key(stackmap_fd, &previous_key, &key) == 0); + /* stack_map_get_build_id_offset() is racy and sometimes can return + * BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP instead of BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID; + * try it one more time. + */ + if (build_id_matches < 1 && retry--) { + ioctl(pmu_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + close(pmu_fd); + bpf_object__close(obj); + printf("%s:WARN:Didn't find expected build ID from the map, retrying\n", + __func__); + goto retry; + } + if (CHECK(build_id_matches < 1, "build id match", "Didn't find expected build ID from the map\n")) goto disable_pmu; @@ -1289,7 +1304,9 @@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi(void) int i, j; struct bpf_stack_build_id id_offs[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH]; int build_id_matches = 0; + int retry = 1; +retry: err = bpf_prog_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, &obj, &prog_fd); if (CHECK(err, "prog_load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno)) return; @@ -1384,6 +1401,19 @@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi(void) previous_key = key; } while (bpf_map_get_next_key(stackmap_fd, &previous_key, &key) == 0); + /* stack_map_get_build_id_offset() is racy and sometimes can return + * BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP instead of BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID; + * try it one more time. + */ + if (build_id_matches < 1 && retry--) { + ioctl(pmu_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + close(pmu_fd); + bpf_object__close(obj); + printf("%s:WARN:Didn't find expected build ID from the map, retrying\n", + __func__); + goto retry; + } + if (CHECK(build_id_matches < 1, "build id match", "Didn't find expected build ID from the map\n")) goto disable_pmu; -- 2.19.1