From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB00C43381 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81D2222CC for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390797AbfBMVk4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:40:56 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37164 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730927AbfBMVk4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:40:56 -0500 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 558871389; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 13:40:53 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jann Horn Cc: Linux-MM , kernel list , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Pavel Tatashin , Oscar Salvador , Mel Gorman , Aaron Lu , Network Development , Alexander Duyck Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: fix ref bias in page_frag_alloc() for 1-byte allocs Message-Id: <20190213134053.3198c33f926f51163dd78256@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20190213204157.12570-1-jannh@google.com> <20190213125906.eae96c18fe585e060aaf0ef7@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.6.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:11:58 +0100 Jann Horn wrote: > > This is probably more a davem patch than a -mm one. > > Ah, sorry. I assumed that I just should go by which directory the > patched code is in. > > You did just add it to the -mm tree though, right? So I shouldn't > resend it to davem? Yes, please send to Dave. I'll autodrop the -mm copy if/when it turns up in -next.