Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jose.abreu@synopsys.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	joao.pinto@synopsys.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com,
	alexandre.torgue@st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Fix NAPI poll in TX path when in multi-queue
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:01:07 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214.090107.1088098621242009425.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a264c48823687434e4d18aeb5830707e00c64250.1550077162.git.joabreu@synopsys.com>

From: Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:00:43 +0100

> Commit 8fce33317023 introduced the concept of NAPI per-channel and
> independent cleaning of TX path.
> 
> This is currently breaking performance in some cases. The scenario
> happens when all packets are being received in Queue 0 but the TX is
> performed in Queue != 0.
> 
> I didn't look very deep but it seems that NAPI for Queue 0 will clean
> the RX path but as TX is in different NAPI, this last one is called at a
> slower rate which kills performance in TX. I suspect this is due to TX
> cleaning takes much longer than RX and because NAPI will get canceled
> once we return with 0 budget consumed (e.g. when TX is still not done it
> will return 0 budget).
> 
> Fix this by looking at all TX channels in NAPI poll function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
> Fixes: 8fce33317023 ("net: stmmac: Rework coalesce timer and fix multi-queue races")

No this isn't right.

The TX interrupt events for Queue != 0 should clean up the TX packets
on those queues.

Furthermore you are breaking the locality of the TX processing.

I'm not applying this, sorry.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-13 17:00 [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Fix NAPI poll in TX path when in multi-queue Jose Abreu
2019-02-14 17:01 ` David Miller [this message]
2019-02-15  1:06   ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190214.090107.1088098621242009425.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=joao.pinto@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jose.abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox