From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jose.abreu@synopsys.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
joao.pinto@synopsys.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com,
alexandre.torgue@st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Fix NAPI poll in TX path when in multi-queue
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:01:07 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214.090107.1088098621242009425.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a264c48823687434e4d18aeb5830707e00c64250.1550077162.git.joabreu@synopsys.com>
From: Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:00:43 +0100
> Commit 8fce33317023 introduced the concept of NAPI per-channel and
> independent cleaning of TX path.
>
> This is currently breaking performance in some cases. The scenario
> happens when all packets are being received in Queue 0 but the TX is
> performed in Queue != 0.
>
> I didn't look very deep but it seems that NAPI for Queue 0 will clean
> the RX path but as TX is in different NAPI, this last one is called at a
> slower rate which kills performance in TX. I suspect this is due to TX
> cleaning takes much longer than RX and because NAPI will get canceled
> once we return with 0 budget consumed (e.g. when TX is still not done it
> will return 0 budget).
>
> Fix this by looking at all TX channels in NAPI poll function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
> Fixes: 8fce33317023 ("net: stmmac: Rework coalesce timer and fix multi-queue races")
No this isn't right.
The TX interrupt events for Queue != 0 should clean up the TX packets
on those queues.
Furthermore you are breaking the locality of the TX processing.
I'm not applying this, sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 17:00 [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Fix NAPI poll in TX path when in multi-queue Jose Abreu
2019-02-14 17:01 ` David Miller [this message]
2019-02-15 1:06 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190214.090107.1088098621242009425.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=joao.pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=jose.abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox