netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
	<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>, "andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: bridge: Stop calling switchdev_port_attr_get()
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:20:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214112002.GA8698@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213220638.1552-8-f.fainelli@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:06:36PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that all switchdev drivers have been converted to checking the
> bridge port flags during the prepare phase of the
> switchdev_port_attr_set() when the process
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS, we can avoid calling
> switchdev_port_attr_get() with
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> index db9e8ab96d48..8f88f8a1a7fa 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> @@ -64,29 +64,27 @@ int br_switchdev_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p,
>  {
>  	struct switchdev_attr attr = {
>  		.orig_dev = p->dev,
> -		.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT,
> +		.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS,
> +		.u.brport_flags = flags,
>  	};
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (mask & ~BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	err = switchdev_port_attr_get(p->dev, &attr);
> -	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> -		return 0;
> -	if (err)
> +	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
> +	if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	/* Check if specific bridge flag attribute offload is supported */
> -	if (!(attr.u.brport_flags_support & mask)) {
> +	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>  		br_warn(p->br, "bridge flag offload is not supported %u(%s)\n",
>  			(unsigned int)p->port_no, p->dev->name);
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return err;
>  	}

I see that you return -EOPNOTSUPP from drivers in case of unsupported
flags. I believe this is problematic (I'll test soon). The same return
code is used by:

1. Switch drivers to indicate unsupported flags
2. switchdev code to indicate unsupported netdev (no switchdev ops)

I guess that with this patch any attempt to set bridge port flags on
veth/dummy device will result in an error.

>  
>  	attr.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS;
>  	attr.flags = SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER;
> -	attr.u.brport_flags = flags;
> +
>  	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
>  	if (err) {
>  		br_warn(p->br, "error setting offload flag on port %u(%s)\n",
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-13 22:06 [PATCH net-next 0/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] Documentation: networking: switchdev: Update port parent ID section Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 10:58   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: switchdev: Add PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 13:11   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Check bridge port flags during prepare Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: dsa: Add setter for SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] rocker: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: bridge: Stop calling switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:20   ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2019-02-14 13:02     ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: Remove SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:27   ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 12:10   ` Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190214112002.GA8698@splinter \
    --to=idosch@mellanox.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).