From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>, "andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: Remove SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:27:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214112749.GA9620@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213220638.1552-9-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:06:37PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that we have converted the bridge code and the drivers to check for
> bridge port(s) flags at the time we try to set them, there is no need
> for a get() -> set() sequence anymore and
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT therefore becomes unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 22:06 [PATCH net-next 0/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] Documentation: networking: switchdev: Update port parent ID section Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 10:58 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: switchdev: Add PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 13:11 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Check bridge port flags during prepare Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: dsa: Add setter for SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] rocker: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: bridge: Stop calling switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:20 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 13:02 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: Remove SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:27 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 12:10 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190214112749.GA9620@splinter \
--to=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).