From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>, "andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Check bridge flags during prepare phase
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:11:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214131143.GA12064@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213220638.1552-4-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:06:32PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> In preparation for getting rid of switchdev_port_attr_get(), have mlxsw
> check for the bridge flags being set through switchdev_port_attr_set()
> when the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier is
> used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> index 1f492b7dbea8..7616eab50035 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
> @@ -598,13 +598,17 @@ mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_learning_set(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port,
> static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_flags_set(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans,
> struct net_device *orig_dev,
> - unsigned long brport_flags)
> + unsigned long brport_flags,
> + bool pre_set)
> {
> struct mlxsw_sp_bridge_port *bridge_port;
> int err;
>
> - if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans))
> + if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(trans) && pre_set) {
> + if (brport_flags & ~(BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> return 0;
> + }
When we get SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS we only want to
perform a check. With this code in case it's not prepare phase, then we
continue to set the flags. Better do:
if (pre_set) {
if (switchdev_trans_ph_commit(trans))
return 0;
// perform check here
}
>
> bridge_port = mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_find(mlxsw_sp_port->mlxsw_sp->bridge,
> orig_dev);
> @@ -833,6 +837,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans)
> {
> struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port = netdev_priv(dev);
> + bool pre_set = false;
> int err;
>
> switch (attr->id) {
> @@ -841,10 +846,13 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
> attr->orig_dev,
> attr->u.stp_state);
> break;
> + case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS:
> + pre_set = true; /* fall through */
> case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS:
> err = mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_flags_set(mlxsw_sp_port, trans,
> attr->orig_dev,
> - attr->u.brport_flags);
> + attr->u.brport_flags,
> + pre_set);
> break;
> case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_AGEING_TIME:
> err = mlxsw_sp_port_attr_br_ageing_set(mlxsw_sp_port, trans,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 22:06 [PATCH net-next 0/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] Documentation: networking: switchdev: Update port parent ID section Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 10:58 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: switchdev: Add PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] mlxsw: spectrum: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 13:11 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Check bridge port flags during prepare Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: dsa: Add setter for SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] rocker: Check bridge flags during prepare phase Florian Fainelli
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: bridge: Stop calling switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:20 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-14 13:02 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: Remove SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS_SUPPORT Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 11:27 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-13 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: Get rid of switchdev_port_attr_get() Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 12:10 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190214131143.GA12064@splinter \
--to=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).