From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
wkok@cumulusnetworks.com, anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linus.luessing@c0d3.blue,
davem@davemloft.net, stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] net: bridge: don't flood known multicast traffic when snooping is enabled
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:53:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190215135346.GB13875@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190215130427.29824-1-nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> The behaviour since b00589af3b04 ("bridge: disable snooping if there is
> no querier") is wrong, we shouldn't be flooding multicast traffic when
> there is an mdb entry and we know where it should be forwarded to when
> multicast snooping is enabled. This patch changes the behaviour to not
> flood known unicast traffic. I'll give two obviously broken cases:
> - most obvious: static mdb created by the user with snooping enabled
> - user-space daemon controlling the mdb table (e.g. MLAG)
>
> Every user would expect to have traffic forwarded only to the configured
> mdb destination when snooping is enabled, instead now to get that one
> needs to enable both snooping and querier. Enabling querier on all
> switches could be problematic and is not a good solution, for example
> as summarized by our multicast experts:
> "every switch would send an IGMP query for any random multicast traffic it
> received across the entire domain and it would send it forever as long as a
> host exists wanting that stream even if it has no downstream/directly
> connected receivers"
>
> Sending as an RFC to get the discussion going, but I'm strongly for
> removing this behaviour and would like to send this patch officially.
>
> We could make this behaviour possible via a knob if necessary, but
> it really should not be the default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Yes. This is great! :)
I had to enable a multicast querier when testing static mdb entries only
because the test was "too long" and this check kicked in. Never made
sense to me. Lets drop it if we can.
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-15 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-15 13:04 [PATCH RFC] net: bridge: don't flood known multicast traffic when snooping is enabled Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-15 13:09 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-15 13:53 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2019-02-15 17:13 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-02-16 8:05 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-16 8:35 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-16 20:04 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-02-16 18:43 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-16 19:15 ` nikolay
2019-02-16 19:27 ` nikolay
2019-02-16 20:37 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-02-17 3:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-17 10:58 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-18 12:21 ` [RFC v2] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-19 8:53 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-02-19 8:57 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-02-19 9:21 ` [Bridge] " Linus Lüssing
2019-02-19 13:31 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-02-19 15:42 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-02-19 17:26 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190215135346.GB13875@splinter \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=wkok@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).