From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABFFC43381 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 15:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DC420C01 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 15:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="gprwmfar" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729962AbfBPPfw (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:35:52 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:55037 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727151AbfBPPfv (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:35:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BCwTNLnSfWmWx+msq9qhbUOplBjAEYWNyi4p1N/H5yM=; b=gprwmfarwTg+Ep8c32bETQsViH m5Ny3E7Y7HCXTrPPkebVghY+533NbYhKh53qfRmwO3WqAT6bBEpwavZTiLcBNDyHxVUXagCvA0ouA HPQZLxs4PPFtFbC8cA0pQu+YGUVD4+/aatWSX0twkneaKXE+nIFaNWPuDfqbd/m3QfSA=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gv20H-0008UV-W0; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:35:46 +0100 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:35:45 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Rundong Ge Cc: vivien.didelot@gmail.com, Florian Fainelli , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: Implement flow_dissect callback for tag_dsa. Message-ID: <20190216153545.GM5699@lunn.ch> References: <20190216083524.860-1-rdong.ge@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 04:38:25PM +0800, Rundong Ge wrote: > Hi Andrew > > I have tested the L3 forwarding throughput performance of my box (with > an intel 4-core processor and each core’s frequency is 2.20GHz). > In my test scenario, I generated 200 UDP flows (frame size is 64 > bytes) with different src/dst pairs from eth1 to eth0. Eth1 is a slave > DSA device from mv88e6190x, eth0 is an intel NIC. Then get the max fps > with no frame losing. > > The max fps with RPS working is 400235fps, frames are hashed to four > cores’ backlog. > And the max fps without RPS is 199686fps. Nice numbers, thanks. Andrew